Register to reply

Relationship between two solutions

by Milligram
Tags: relationship, solutions
Share this thread:
Milligram
#1
Sep10-11, 01:47 PM
P: 2
Let [itex] t \in \mathbb{R} [/itex] be large.
Let [itex] f [/itex] be a function over [itex] [0,t] [/itex] satisfying [itex] f(0) = 1 [/itex] and [itex] f'(x) = e^{-f(x)} [/itex] for all [itex] x[/itex].
Let [itex] g [/itex] be a function over [itex] [0,t] [/itex] satisfying [itex] g(0) = 1 [/itex] and [itex] g'(x) = (1 - g(x)/t^2)^{t^2} [/itex] for all [itex] x[/itex]. Note that [itex] g'(x) \sim e^{-g(x)}[/itex].

Without solving the two differential equations and finding out [itex] f [/itex] and [itex] g [/itex] (which can be done at least approximately), can the fact that [itex] f(0)=g(0)=1 [/itex] and [itex] g'(x) \sim e^{-g(x)} [/itex] be used to show that [itex] f(x) \sim g(x) [/itex] for all [itex] x[/itex] in [itex] [0,t][/itex] ?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Security CTO to detail Android Fake ID flaw at Black Hat
Huge waves measured for first time in Arctic Ocean
Mysterious molecules in space
HallsofIvy
#2
Sep11-11, 02:33 PM
Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 39,348
Quote Quote by Milligram View Post
Let [itex] t \in \mathbb{R} [/itex] be large.
Let [itex] f [/itex] be a function over [itex] [0,t] [/itex] satisfying [itex] f(0) = 1 [/itex] and [itex] f'(x) = e^{-f(x)} [/itex] for all [itex] x[/itex].
Let [itex] g [/itex] be a function over [itex] [0,t] [/itex] satisfying [itex] g(0) = 1 [/itex] and [itex] g'(x) = (1 - g(x)/t^2)^{t^2} [/itex] for all [itex] x[/itex].
This makes no sense. If g is a function of x only, its derivative cannot depend upon both x and t. Did you mean [itex]g'(x) = (1 - g(x)/x^2)^{x^2} [/itex]?

Note that [itex] g'(x) \sim e^{-g(x)}[/itex].

Without solving the two differential equations and finding out [itex] f [/itex] and [itex] g [/itex] (which can be done at least approximately), can the fact that [itex] f(0)=g(0)=1 [/itex] and [itex] g'(x) \sim e^{-g(x)} [/itex] be used to show that [itex] f(x) \sim g(x) [/itex] for all [itex] x[/itex] in [itex] [0,t][/itex] ?
Milligram
#3
Sep11-11, 05:38 PM
P: 2
HallsofIvy, I meant for [itex] g(x) [/itex] to depend on [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]t[/itex]. You should think of [itex]t[/itex] as being a large constant, say, [itex] t=10^{10} [/itex].


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Relationship between f(x) and f(1/x) Precalculus Mathematics Homework 2
Complex-valued solutions to real-valued solutions Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
Can anyone see a relationship here? General Math 19
Relationship Introductory Physics Homework 1