Are supermassive black holes just big stars?


by Singlecoil
Tags: black holes
Singlecoil
Singlecoil is offline
#1
Dec15-11, 09:55 AM
P: 1
Simple enough question. I know there are two types of black holes; the type formed after a star collapses in a supernova and the supermassive variety like the one at the center of the milky way.
If a star continued to grow by swallowing up other stars and solar systems is it possible that at a certain point its gravitational field would become so strong that light and heat could no longer escape? It would be a tipping point. Prior to reaching that mass it would be a bright star, but as it continued to grow it would start to dim as some wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum could no longer escape the massive star's gravitational field. Eventually it would reach such a size that it would appear dark to an observer, but in reality it is a bright and hot star that can no longer be conventionally detected.
Phys.Org News Partner Space news on Phys.org
Red moon at night; stargazer's delight
Computers beat brainpower when it comes to counting stars
Meteorites yield clues to Martian early atmosphere
mathman
mathman is offline
#2
Dec15-11, 03:11 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 5,935
(Not absolutely sure.) As long as the star is shining its volume would be too big to become a black hole. Once it runs out of fuel then things would happen.
phinds
phinds is offline
#3
Dec15-11, 03:15 PM
PF Gold
phinds's Avatar
P: 5,675
Seems likely that if you have enough mass in a small volume to keep photons from escaping, you have enough mass in a small volume that it will collapse into a black hole.

Or it may be that a BH has to already BE there to keep photons from escaping.

Nabeshin
Nabeshin is offline
#4
Dec15-11, 04:01 PM
Sci Advisor
Nabeshin's Avatar
P: 2,194

Are supermassive black holes just big stars?


Quote Quote by phinds View Post
Seems likely that if you have enough mass in a small volume to keep photons from escaping, you have enough mass in a small volume that it will collapse into a black hole.
Indeed, this is a tautology by definition :)
Ryan_m_b
Ryan_m_b is online now
#5
Dec15-11, 04:18 PM
Mentor
Ryan_m_b's Avatar
P: 5,340
Quote Quote by Singlecoil View Post
Prior to reaching that mass it would be a bright star, but as it continued to grow it would start to dim as some wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum could no longer escape the massive star's gravitational field.
All wavelengths of light travel at the same speed, if the gravity is enough to stop one then it can stop all.
Drakkith
Drakkith is offline
#6
Dec15-11, 07:48 PM
PF Gold
Drakkith's Avatar
P: 11,005
I don't believe this is possible. Wouldn't an existing star simply burn more fuel, resisting collapse?
phinds
phinds is offline
#7
Dec15-11, 07:59 PM
PF Gold
phinds's Avatar
P: 5,675
Quote Quote by Drakkith View Post
I don't believe this is possible. Wouldn't an existing star simply burn more fuel, resisting collapse?
If that were true, how would ANY BH ever form? I think I must be missing something about what you are saying.
Drakkith
Drakkith is offline
#8
Dec15-11, 08:29 PM
PF Gold
Drakkith's Avatar
P: 11,005
Quote Quote by phinds View Post
If that were true, how would ANY BH ever form? I think I must be missing something about what you are saying.
I'm not saying that it wouldn't EVER turn into a black hole, only that it wouldn't be a black hole until it runs out of fuel.
Chronos
Chronos is offline
#9
Dec15-11, 09:23 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Chronos's Avatar
P: 9,178
The Jeans mass limits the 'birth' mass of stars [which varies for Pop 1, II and III stars]. The mass limit for coalescence of stars is not well known. Stellar collisions are so extraordinarily rare in the univerve we have insufficient observational data to model the upper limit for these events. One thing, however, is well established, enormously massive stars simply do not live long enough to accrete a large amount of additional mass. Stars more than 100 solar masses only live for tens of millions of years, as compared to the sun, which has a life expectancy of around ten billion years.
phinds
phinds is offline
#10
Dec15-11, 10:18 PM
PF Gold
phinds's Avatar
P: 5,675
Quote Quote by Drakkith View Post
I'm not saying that it wouldn't EVER turn into a black hole, only that it wouldn't be a black hole until it runs out of fuel.
Ah, I KNEW there was something I wasn't connecting the dots with. Thanks.
Cosmo Novice
Cosmo Novice is offline
#11
Dec16-11, 06:11 AM
P: 366
Hello all,

As many of you have seen a few of my posts you will know I am not overly speculative, so I am in no way promoting this as a theory just want to know if anything along these lines has been pursued before:

I have read somewhere that the early U may have had enormous stars, in orders of magnitude larger than current stars, would it be possible that the SMBH's at the center of each galaxy formed from these primordial massive stars? Or would we see evidence of this in the most distant galaxies? Are there any predictions for what massive objects formed the SMBH's or are they considered to merely have grown due to being "fed" stellar material for a few billion years?

Any information is appreciated.
mathman
mathman is offline
#12
Dec16-11, 03:32 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 5,935
Quote Quote by Cosmo Novice View Post
Hello all,

As many of you have seen a few of my posts you will know I am not overly speculative, so I am in no way promoting this as a theory just want to know if anything along these lines has been pursued before:

I have read somewhere that the early U may have had enormous stars, in orders of magnitude larger than current stars, would it be possible that the SMBH's at the center of each galaxy formed from these primordial massive stars? Or would we see evidence of this in the most distant galaxies? Are there any predictions for what massive objects formed the SMBH's or are they considered to merely have grown due to being "fed" stellar material for a few billion years?

Any information is appreciated.
The early stars were (order of magnitude) around 100 solar masses.

Black holes at galactic centers are of the order of millions to billions of solar masses. It seems unlikely that they could form from early stars without accumulating a lot more material.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Density of supermassive black holes. Astrophysics 12
Coalescing Supermassive Black Holes Astrophysics 3
Dark matter and supermassive black holes Cosmology 7
do we know where supermassive black holes come from? Astrophysics 1
metric of supermassive black holes Special & General Relativity 2