
#37
Jan512, 07:12 AM

P: 790

To give an example that has gotten a lot of interest recently, the "AdS/CFT correspondence" is the statement that two very different specific mathematical theories actually (and very surprisingly) describe the same physics. But these two theories seem very differentfor example, they posit different numbers of spacetime dimensions! So one theory might say that spacetime has 4 dimensions while the other says that spacetime has 5 dimensions. Since both predict the exact same results, it becomes clear that the mathematics of a physical theory doesn't tell you how you should picture the universe described by the theory. You can think of it as a 4dimensional spacetime with one set of physical laws. You can think of it as a 5dimensional spacetime with a different set of physical laws, and this turns out to be completely equivalent to the other description. You can think of it as a simulation proceeding in a cellular automaton computed by a sentient frog (though this is probably a less useful picture), so long as you posit that the simulation is programmed in a way that corresponds to the predictions of the theory. 



#38
Jan512, 07:38 AM

Mentor
P: 16,482




Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
time saving and not obscuring way of teaching special relativity theory??  Educators & Teaching  9  
Are "two line derivations" harmful in teaching special relativity  Special & General Relativity  8  
light clock and teaching of special relativity  Special & General Relativity  12  
teaching special relativity  Special & General Relativity  29  
My mom, the new skeptic!  General Discussion  9 