Paul Davies says string theory is patently false


by bobsmith76
Tags: davies, patently, paul, string, theory
bobsmith76
bobsmith76 is offline
#1
Jan31-12, 01:12 AM
P: 339
In a youtube video Paul Davies Beyond Belief,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwkw39Euc64

he said that string theory and M theory were so obviously and patently false that he didn't even bother to discuss them. I thought Lee Smolin was the only critic of string theory I didn't know that Paul Davies was one too. How much weight does Paul Davies' voice carry in the physics community?


I put this thread in Beyond the Standard Model because it discusses string theory.
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Better thermal-imaging lens from waste sulfur
Scientists observe quantum superconductor-metal transition and superconducting glass
New technique detects microscopic diabetes-related eye damage
Greg Bernhardt
Greg Bernhardt is offline
#2
Jan31-12, 01:19 AM
Admin
Greg Bernhardt's Avatar
P: 8,534
Do you have a link to this video or an article to reference?
torquil
torquil is offline
#3
Jan31-12, 05:36 AM
P: 640
Quote Quote by bobsmith76 View Post
he said that string theory and M theory were so obviously and patently false that he didn't even bother to discuss them.
Sounds sort of like a preventive tactic, designed to make anyone who wishes to oppose that view come off as being naive or foolish, in the eyes of outsiders... No more explanation was given, at least in the three video parts I watched.

I thought Lee Smolin was the only critic of string theory
There are plenty of critics of string theory.

LBloom
LBloom is offline
#4
Jan31-12, 10:15 AM
P: 173

Paul Davies says string theory is patently false


String theory is not patently false. It is a tentative theory for everything, the best we have yet) which should not be accepted as fact yet. To say that it is simply false is just as bad as those who simply say its correct. We don't know if it is or isn't, only time will tell when its confirmed or disregarded for a theory that works better.

Whether the study of ST should be funded the way it is is a matter of politics. Whether there are better models out there is a debate physicists should be having and I think they are. For now high energy theorists work with what they can until hopefully new physics starts showing up or some headway is made with these various models.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Would string theory research papers have value if string theory is physically wrong? Beyond the Standard Model 8
If GUT are false, are string-based unification also false? Beyond the Standard Model 1
Naive Set Theory by Paul R. Halmos Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 1
Other Worlds by Paul Davies Science & Math Textbook Listings 2
E.T. AND GOD: by Paul Davies; Prof. of Nat. Philosophy General Discussion 0