Rest mass of the photon


by zachfoltz
Tags: nonzero, photon, rest mass, string
zachfoltz
zachfoltz is offline
#1
Feb11-12, 03:27 PM
P: 25
I'm new to physics, so I'm sorry if this is a dumb question. If a string cannot be point like, it has measurable spacial dimensions, then it must have mass. Well if a string was vibrating at the resonant frequency of a photon, and at rest it must have mass and therefore a nonzero rest mass. This is obviously wrong because according to SR a photon must have 0 rest mass. what am I getting wrong here?

Thanks
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists design quantum switches which can be activated by single photons
'Dressed' laser aimed at clouds may be key to inducing rain, lightning
Higher-order nonlinear optical processes observed using the SACLA X-ray free-electron laser
LBloom
LBloom is offline
#2
Feb11-12, 03:48 PM
P: 173
You're right, a string does have a finite spacial extent. However, just because it is not point like does not mean it has to have mass. In fact, when bosonic string theory was first being studied, people discovered objects with negative mass squared. The presence of tachyons (objects with imaginary mass) showed that the vacuum was unstable and showed the need for fermions.

It certainly is strange to think about, but string theory does have objects that are massless but not pointlike. To me a massless point like object is just as strange when you think about it!
mathman
mathman is offline
#3
Feb11-12, 03:54 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 5,935
A naive way of looking at is that strings are 1 dimensional, so they don't necessarily have mass. Current theory seems to say that mass results from interaction with the Higgs field. Without Higgs nothing would have mass.

zachfoltz
zachfoltz is offline
#4
Feb11-12, 03:55 PM
P: 25

Rest mass of the photon


Your right, that is pretty weird as well!

But that raises the question, if a point like particle has no mass, it "doesn't exist", or at least isn't observable. However if a string doesn't have mass, do we treat it the same as a point particle? or does it exist spatially but have no mass?

Thanks for the help it's much appreciated!
mathman
mathman is offline
#5
Feb12-12, 05:36 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 5,935
Current state of physics theory is such that any answer to your questions are very speculative.
ohwilleke
ohwilleke is offline
#6
Feb13-12, 09:17 PM
P: 632
One way to get some particles that are massive, while others are massless, is to conceptualize the distinction as related to an orientation to timeline v. spacelike dimensions respectively.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Does photon have a rest frame? Special & General Relativity 25
Photon at rest Special & General Relativity 5
Rest frame of a photon Relativity FAQ 0
Why does a photon have zero rest mass? Special & General Relativity 14
Mass (both relativistic and rest) of a photon Special & General Relativity 16