New Reply

Prove that a normed space is not Banach

 
Share Thread
Feb16-12, 09:21 AM   #1
 

Prove that a normed space is not Banach


Hello everyone,
I have a problem and cannot solve it. Could you help? Here it is
We have a normed space and an uncountable Hamel basis of it. Prove that it is not a Banach space.
Should I use Baire theorem? Any suggestions?
PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com

>> City-life changes blackbird personalities, study shows
>> Origins of 'The Hoff' crab revealed (w/ Video)
>> Older males make better fathers: Mature male beetles work harder, care less about female infidelity
Feb16-12, 09:50 AM   #2
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 8
You're not giving us much information to work with. If you want to show something not Banach, then try to find a Cauchy sequence which does not converge.
There are other ways to prove this of course. A lot depends on the space in question.
Feb16-12, 10:37 AM   #3
 
You must have a particular space in mind that you didn't specify. An infinite dimensional Banach space necessarily has an uncountable Hamel basis so your result is not general. You need to show that your space is not complete. What is your space?
Feb16-12, 12:12 PM   #4
 

Prove that a normed space is not Banach


The exercise does not refer to a particular space. It is just a normed space X with an uncountable Hamel basis. A solution I came up with was to make a finite dimension closed subspace and show using baire that it is X, leading to a contadiction.
If the problem gave us a space for this example which one would that be?
Feb16-12, 12:13 PM   #5
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 8
Could you quote the exercise exactly as it was given??
Feb16-12, 12:39 PM   #6
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by russel View Post
The exercise does not refer to a particular space. It is just a normed space X with an uncountable Hamel basis. A solution I came up with was to make a finite dimension closed subspace and show using baire that it is X, leading to a contadiction.
If the problem gave us a space for this example which one would that be?
But, how could you prove that a closed subspace of an undefined space equals the space itself?
Feb16-12, 01:09 PM   #7
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 8
Also notice that a finite dimensional normed space is always Banach, so your proof is likely incorrect.
New Reply

Similar discussions for: Prove that a normed space is not Banach
Thread Forum Replies
Using Correlation :Random Variables as a Normed Space (Banach, Hilbert maybe.?) Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 3
Prove Finite Dimensional Normed Vector Space is Differentiable Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
normed linear space and inner product space Calculus & Beyond Homework 8
Banach space Calculus & Beyond Homework 5
Banach space C(X) Differential Geometry 6