Galaxy size particle accelerator


by waterfall
Tags: accelerator, galaxy, particle, size
waterfall
waterfall is offline
#1
Feb16-12, 01:15 PM
P: 381
It is said that it takes a particle accelerator the size of a milky way to probe the planck length. But with the resources available in the universe and with other billions year A.D. civilizations out there existing. What if they had created one already. Is there any galaxy out there that look like a particle accelerator in Astronomy?

Also what is the equivalent Tev to probe the planck scale. How many Hiroshima size atomic bombs for example in energy or is it just the energy of a train collision?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
NASA's space station Robonaut finally getting legs
Free the seed: OSSI nurtures growing plants without patent barriers
Going nuts? Turkey looks to pistachios to heat new eco-city
eXmag
eXmag is offline
#2
Feb16-12, 03:20 PM
P: 33
you don't need a galaxy size particle accelerator to probe anything at all nor do we need one on earth. I highly doubt there is a galaxy size particle accelerator out there because it would be useless. The real key is being creative and figuring out how to piece together the universe.
waterfall
waterfall is offline
#3
Feb16-12, 05:42 PM
P: 381
Quote Quote by eXmag View Post
you don't need a galaxy size particle accelerator to probe anything at all nor do we need one on earth. I highly doubt there is a galaxy size particle accelerator out there because it would be useless. The real key is being creative and figuring out how to piece together the universe.
Momentum is proportional to wavelength... so is it right that one divides the planck constant by the wavelength of the planck scale?

What is the wavelength of the planck scale? How many TeV result? And is it equal to in terms of daily experience.. like the energy to lift a hundred pound weight?

Does anyone know about this?

Drakkith
Drakkith is offline
#4
Feb16-12, 08:21 PM
PF Gold
Drakkith's Avatar
P: 11,036

Galaxy size particle accelerator


Quote Quote by eXmag View Post
you don't need a galaxy size particle accelerator to probe anything at all nor do we need one on earth. I highly doubt there is a galaxy size particle accelerator out there because it would be useless. The real key is being creative and figuring out how to piece together the universe.
It doesn't matter how creative one is if one cannot verify the results.
phinds
phinds is offline
#5
Feb16-12, 08:34 PM
PF Gold
phinds's Avatar
P: 5,685
Quote Quote by eXmag View Post
you don't need a galaxy size particle accelerator to probe anything at all nor do we need one on earth.
So you figure all those physicists all over the world who want bigger and better particle accelerators are just dumb? And you clearly are smarter?
Chronos
Chronos is offline
#6
Feb16-12, 10:26 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Chronos's Avatar
P: 9,182
We don't need a bigger accelerator, the universe does a fine job on its own.
Nabeshin
Nabeshin is offline
#7
Feb16-12, 10:34 PM
Sci Advisor
Nabeshin's Avatar
P: 2,194
Quote Quote by waterfall View Post
Also what is the equivalent Tev to probe the planck scale. How many Hiroshima size atomic bombs for example in energy or is it just the energy of a train collision?
The Planck energy is approximately the amount of energy released in a bolt of lightning. The trick is focusing it in an incredibly small volume (for comparison, the LHC should operate at 14TeV, about the energy expended by a fly performing a pushup).
waterfall
waterfall is offline
#8
Feb16-12, 11:16 PM
P: 381
Quote Quote by Nabeshin View Post
The Planck energy is approximately the amount of energy released in a bolt of lightning. The trick is focusing it in an incredibly small volume (for comparison, the LHC should operate at 14TeV, about the energy expended by a fly performing a pushup).
So one has to build particle accelerator the size of a galaxy to concentrate the energy of a bolt of lightning into the planck scale?

From the formula

Momentum = planck constant / Wavelength

What's the wavelength of the planck length?
And what's the units of the momentum and how do you carry the bolt of lightning into the probing carrier wave of the momentum to reach the planck scale?
eXmag
eXmag is offline
#9
Feb18-12, 01:45 AM
P: 33
Quote Quote by phinds View Post
So you figure all those physicists all over the world who want bigger and better particle accelerators are just dumb? And you clearly are smarter?
why do we need a particle accelerator? i clearly did not say that i was smart, all i am, is being creative. Why do we need to bombard particles at high speeds? will that enable us to travel to other worlds? no, one has to understand the mere building blocks of time to fully understand the universe. There is no such thing as a higgs boson nor will we find one because it doesnt exist. The real key to the future is energy not creating neutrinos and antimatter or whatever.
Chronos
Chronos is offline
#10
Feb18-12, 02:32 AM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Chronos's Avatar
P: 9,182
Assumes facts not in evidence. That is why we continue building bigger accelerators. My only objection is it is merely an exercise in the law of diminishing returns. I am fairly convinced the LHC is our last and best effort at particle physics. Whatever is left, however improbable, is left for cosmologists to explore.
waterfall
waterfall is offline
#11
Feb18-12, 03:20 AM
P: 381
If M-Theory were discovered, maybe there would be a shortcut such that instead of a galaxy sized particle accelerator, it would just be tabletop size using perhaps M-energy from M-theory to probe the planck scale... using something to compact the lightning bolt and compress it down to planck size. Remember in Manhattan Project, they were able to use compresion bomb to compress the uranium or plutonium and made the nuke go off at first try. This is very impressive. Imagine doing something they hadn't done before and it exploded the first time. Bottomline is, We have literally many geniuses in our midst..
Astronuc
Astronuc is offline
#12
Feb18-12, 03:30 AM
Admin
Astronuc's Avatar
P: 21,634
Closed pending moderation.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Blackhole & Galaxy size General Astronomy 4
reason for stereotypical galaxy size General Astronomy 0
Arcsecond size of the Andromeda Galaxy General Astronomy 2
Transit time of particle in a particle accelerator question Classical Physics 4
XRD data: particle size, cell size etc Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 4