Register to reply 
Partial Derivatives of Vectors and Gradients 
Share this thread: 
#1
Feb1712, 12:37 PM

P: 82

I was reading a section on vector fields and realized I am confused about how to take partials of vector quantities. If V(x,y)= yi xj, I don't understand why the [itex]\partialx[/itex]= y and the [itex]\partialy[/itex]= x. The problem is showing why the previous equation is not a gradient vector field (because the secondorder partials are not equal). 3 questions arise for me:
1) It seems to me that the only way you could obtain this answer for the [itex]\partialx[/itex] part of the gradient would be to only look at the i value and ignore the j value. But why can you ignore the j component? Is that because of the gradient's definition 2) Following off of the previous question, would[itex]\partialx[/itex] be something different (still using these vector components) if we were not interested in the gradient? And thus, is there something about taking gradients of vectors that can lead to an inequality among partials (because of only looking at certain components at certain times)? 3)And how is it that [itex]\partialx[/itex] yi = y? Does i serve as "x," so that it is like taking the partial of yx? If so why is that? 


#2
Feb1712, 01:14 PM

P: 82

Sorry, every time I attempted to write the partial derivative of V with respect to x, it just ended up saying "partial" in red font. Just so you know what it was intended to be...



#3
Feb1712, 10:06 PM

P: 38

A gradient vector field means the vector field is the gradient of a scalar function.
For example, if ##\vec V## is a gradient vector field, then there is a scalar function ##\phi## such that ##\vec V=\nabla\phi.## If ##\vec V=v_1\vec i+v_2\vec j##, then ##v_1=\frac{∂\phi}{∂x},v_2=\frac{∂\phi}{∂y},## so ##\frac{∂v_1}{∂y}=\frac{∂v_2}{∂x}=\frac{∂^2\phi}{∂x∂y}.## For ##\vec V=y\vec ix\vec j,\frac{∂}{∂y}(y)\ne\frac{∂}{∂x}(x),## not a gradient vector field. 


#4
Feb1812, 06:24 AM

Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 39,345

Partial Derivatives of Vectors and Gradients



#5
Feb1812, 07:33 AM

P: 82

Thanks for your hep but I am still confused about a couple of things though. Why is [itex]\partial[/itex] / [itex]\partial x[/itex] of yi  xj = y? To me, it makes sense that when you are dealing with the i component and taking its partial with respect to x, you look at the value in front of the component, which is y. And [itex]\partial[/itex] / [itex]\partial x [/itex] (y) = zero. I just want to make sense of why the answer is y.
Also, I understand that equality of mixed partials must be equal is an implicit idea within the concept of a gradient, but is there a reason or proof for this, or just a definition? Thank you again. 


#6
Feb1812, 10:08 AM

Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 39,345

[tex]\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x\partial y}= \frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial y\partial x}[/tex] You should be able to find a proof of that in any Calculus book. You can find a paper on how Euler derived it here: http://www.maa.org/editorial/euler/H...erivatives.pdf 


#7
Feb1812, 02:45 PM

P: 82

Oh, and thanks for the interesting link to the paper! 


#8
Feb1812, 04:12 PM

Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 39,345




#9
Feb1812, 06:19 PM

P: 82

Here is the complete example: Example 7: Show that the vector field V on R^{2} defined by V= yixj is not a gradient vector field; that is, there is no C^{1} function f such that V=[itex]\nabla[/itex] f(x,y)= [itex]\partial f [/itex] /[itex]\partial x [/itex] i + [itex]\partial f [/itex] / [itex]\partial y [/itex] j. Solution Suppose that such an f exists. Then [itex]\partial f [/itex] /[itex]\partial x [/itex] = y and [itex]\partial f [/itex] /[itex]\partial y [/itex] = x. Because these are C^{1} functions, f itself must have continuous first and secondorder partial derivatives. But... (goes on to show mixed partials are not equal. Is this different because of the "f" you were talking about...somehow it changes the operation? 


#10
Feb1812, 07:31 PM

Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 39,345

Thanks, that makes sense. But you are NOT taking the partial derivatives of yi and xj. You want to determine if there is a scalar function f(x,y) so that the derivative of f with respect to x is equal to the coefficent of i (which in this problem is y) and the derivative of f with respect to y is equal tio the coefficient of j (which in this problem is x).
In other words, rather than saying [itex]\partial/\partial x (yi xj)= y[/itex] and that [itex]\partial/\partial y (yi xj)= x[/itex] they are asking if there exist a function f(x, y) such that [itex]\partial f/\partial x= y[/itex] and [itex]\partial f/\partial y= x[/itex]. If it were true that [itex]\partial f/\partial x= y[/itex] then it would have to be true that [itex]\partial^2 f/\partial x\partial y= 1[/itex]. And if it were true that [itex]\partial f/\partial y= x[/itex] then it would have to be true that [itex]\partial^2 f/\partial y\partial x= 1[/itex]. Here's a different way of thinking about it. If if were true that [itex]\partial f/\partial x= y[/itex], because taking the partial derivative with respect to x treats y like a constant, integrating, we must have f(x,y)= xy+ C except that because we treating y like a constant, that constant of integration, C, might depend on y: f(x,y)= xy+ C(y). Differentiating with respect to y, we have [itex]\partial f/\partial y= x+ C'(y)[/itex]. But that must be equal to x: x+ C'(y)= x so that C'(y)= 2x which is, of course, impossible since C only depends on y. 


#11
Feb1912, 12:44 PM

P: 82




Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Partial derivatives as basis vectors?  Special & General Relativity  6  
Gradients and Directional Derivatives  Calculus & Beyond Homework  1  
Gradients of Vectors and Dyadic Products  Differential Geometry  8  
Vectors, oneforms and gradients  Differential Geometry  71  
Gradients and unit vectors  Precalculus Mathematics Homework  2 