New Reply

Einstein Tensor; What is wrong here?

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Feb18-12, 08:11 AM   #1
 

Einstein Tensor; What is wrong here?


Start with

[itex]\nabla^{\mu}[/itex]R[itex]_{\mu\nu}[/itex]=[itex]\nabla^{\mu}[/itex]R[itex]_{\mu\nu}[/itex]

Insert

[itex]\nabla^{\mu}[/itex]R[itex]_{\mu\nu}[/itex]=[itex]\nabla^{\mu}[/itex][itex]\frac{g_{\mu\nu}g^{\mu\nu}}{4}[/itex]R[itex]_{\mu\nu}[/itex]

Contract the Ricci Tensor

[itex]\nabla^{\mu}[/itex]R[itex]_{\mu\nu}[/itex] = [itex]\nabla^{\mu}[/itex][itex]\frac{g_{\mu\nu}}{4}[/itex]R

Thus

[itex]\nabla^{\mu}[/itex]R[itex]_{\mu\nu}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{1}{4}[/itex][itex]\nabla^{\mu}[/itex][itex]{g_{\mu\nu}}[/itex]R

But General Relativity says

[itex]\nabla^{\mu}[/itex]R[itex]_{\mu\nu}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex][itex]\nabla^{\mu}[/itex][itex]{g_{\mu\nu}}[/itex]R

What is wrong here?
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Heat-related deaths in Manhattan projected to rise
>> Dire outlook despite global warming 'pause': study
>> Sea level influenced tropical climate during the last ice age
Feb18-12, 09:02 AM   #2
 
Blog Entries: 47
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by nobraner View Post
Start with

[itex]\nabla^{\mu}[/itex]R[itex]_{\mu\nu}[/itex]=[itex]\nabla^{\mu}[/itex]R[itex]_{\mu\nu}[/itex]

Insert

[itex]\nabla^{\mu}[/itex]R[itex]_{\mu\nu}[/itex]=[itex]\nabla^{\mu}[/itex][itex]\frac{g_{\mu\nu}g^{\mu\nu}}{4}[/itex]R[itex]_{\mu\nu}[/itex]

[snip]

What is wrong here?
Your inserted factor should be
[itex]\nabla^{\mu}[/itex]R[itex]_{\mu\nu}[/itex]=[itex]\nabla^{\mu}[/itex][itex]\frac{g_{\sigma\tau}g^{\sigma\tau}}{4}[/itex]R[itex]_{\mu\nu}[/itex] (since [itex]\mu[/itex] and [itex]\nu[/itex] are already "taken").


Note that since your proposed proof makes no use of the unique properties of Ricci, it would seem that your result would work for any symmetric tensor. So, you must look at it with suspicion.
 
Feb18-12, 10:58 AM   #3
 
I don't understand your declaration that [itex]\mu \nu[/itex] are already taken. Does that mean we can never assume that such a metric as

g[itex]^{\mu\nu}[/itex]

exists with out first proving that it is so for the specific case of

[itex]\nabla^{\mu}[/itex]R[itex]_{\mu\nu}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{1}{4}[/itex][itex]\nabla^{\mu}[/itex]g[itex]_{\mu\nu}[/itex]R
 
Feb18-12, 01:21 PM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member

Einstein Tensor; What is wrong here?


Quote by nobraner View Post
I don't understand your declaration that [itex]\mu \nu[/itex] are already taken. Does that mean we can never assume that such a metric as

g[itex]^{\mu\nu}[/itex]

exists with out first proving that it is so for the specific case of

[itex]\nabla^{\mu}[/itex]R[itex]_{\mu\nu}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{1}{4}[/itex][itex]\nabla^{\mu}[/itex]g[itex]_{\mu\nu}[/itex]R
You're overloading your indices. An index shouldn't appear more than twice in any term.
 
Feb18-12, 02:46 PM   #5
 
Quote by nobraner View Post
I don't understand your declaration that [itex]\mu \nu[/itex] are already taken. Does that mean we can never assume that such a metric as

g[itex]^{\mu\nu}[/itex]

exists with out first proving that it is so for the specific case of

[itex]\nabla^{\mu}[/itex]R[itex]_{\mu\nu}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{1}{4}[/itex][itex]\nabla^{\mu}[/itex]g[itex]_{\mu\nu}[/itex]R
There is a double sum in the term that you inserted. Therefore you cannot contract the Ricci leaving out the g[itex]_{\mu\nu}[/itex]
 
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Einstein Tensor; What is wrong here?
Thread Forum Replies
Einstein Tensor; super simple derivation; where did I go wrong? Special & General Relativity 8
General Tensor contraction: Trace of Energy-Momentum Tensor (Einstein metric) Special & General Relativity 5
Einstein Tensor... Special & General Relativity 15
Einstein Tensor Special & General Relativity 5
Einstein Tensor Calculus & Beyond Homework 12