Register to reply

Science in Context

by mathscience
Tags: context, science
Share this thread:
mathscience
#1
Feb19-12, 09:33 PM
P: 0
I've been thinking about the concept of clarity as it applies to science.

A white object is most clearly seen with a black background or context.

So how does that principle apply to science? In other words, with what context should we view science so we can see it most clearly?

Theoretically, going by the white-black principle, science should be seen in the context most opposite from it, so it can be seen the most clearly.

I'm sure there are many answers to this question.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Scientists discover RNA modifications in some unexpected places
Scientists discover tropical tree microbiome in Panama
'Squid skin' metamaterials project yields vivid color display
Pengwuino
#2
Feb19-12, 09:39 PM
PF Gold
Pengwuino's Avatar
P: 7,120
I think this post needs more context to make any sense :)
WannabeNewton
#3
Feb19-12, 09:42 PM
C. Spirit
Sci Advisor
Thanks
WannabeNewton's Avatar
P: 5,661
Can you give an example?

micromass
#4
Feb19-12, 09:44 PM
Mentor
micromass's Avatar
P: 18,346
Science in Context

You're taking the metaphor way too far. But I'm waiting for the reasons why you made this post.

What do you think science is missing??
OmCheeto
#5
Feb19-12, 09:46 PM
PF Gold
OmCheeto's Avatar
P: 1,435
Quote Quote by mathscience View Post
I've been thinking about the concept of clarity as it applies to science.

A white object is most clearly seen with a black background or context.

So how does that principle apply to science? In other words, with what context should we view science so we can see it most clearly?

Theoretically, going by the white-black principle, science should be seen in the context most opposite from it, so it can be seen the most clearly.

I'm sure there are many answers to this question.
You are absolutely correct. I once photographed a white bird in the snow, and all you could see was a beady little eye.



Contrast!
mathscience
#6
Feb19-12, 09:51 PM
P: 0
Maybe politics. The global warming debate (banned on here) uses science in a political context. One could contend that politics isn't rational, so it stands in stark contrast to science.
micromass
#7
Feb19-12, 09:52 PM
Mentor
micromass's Avatar
P: 18,346
But what are you proposing?? Isn't science good how it is now??
WannabeNewton
#8
Feb19-12, 09:52 PM
C. Spirit
Sci Advisor
Thanks
WannabeNewton's Avatar
P: 5,661
That seems pretty limited. What if you are talking about theoretical physics...what would you "contrast it with"...
Evo
#9
Feb19-12, 09:53 PM
Mentor
Evo's Avatar
P: 26,659
Quote Quote by mathscience View Post
Theoretically, going by the white-black principle, science should be seen in the context most opposite from it, so it can be seen the most clearly.
Explain what you mean by this.
mathscience
#10
Feb19-12, 09:57 PM
P: 0
Think of it in terms of Newton's principle. Equal and opposite. We must theoretically create an "anti-science" that is equal and opposite to the science were are thinking about. Just like you can't see something white if the background is also white.
micromass
#11
Feb19-12, 09:59 PM
Mentor
micromass's Avatar
P: 18,346
Quote Quote by mathscience View Post
Think of it in terms of Newton's principle. Equal and opposite. We must theoretically create an "anti-science" that is equal and opposite to the science were are thinking about. Just like you can't see something white if the background is also white.
And what must that anti-science consist of?? What do you propose??
WannabeNewton
#12
Feb19-12, 10:00 PM
C. Spirit
Sci Advisor
Thanks
WannabeNewton's Avatar
P: 5,661
So for some physical theory you want a respective theory that makes all the wrong predictions and fails to represent reality?
DaveC426913
#13
Feb19-12, 10:02 PM
DaveC426913's Avatar
P: 15,319
The opposite is religion.

Science is about knowing based on facts.
Religion is about knowing in the absence of facts (AKA faith).
micromass
#14
Feb19-12, 10:02 PM
Mentor
micromass's Avatar
P: 18,346
Quote Quote by WannabeNewton View Post
So for some physical theory you want a respective theory that makes all the wrong predictions and fails to represent reality?
No, he wants science books consisting of anti-particles.
WannabeNewton
#15
Feb19-12, 10:03 PM
C. Spirit
Sci Advisor
Thanks
WannabeNewton's Avatar
P: 5,661
Quote Quote by micromass View Post
No, he wants science books consisting of anti-particles.
Sounds dangerous.
mathscience
#16
Feb19-12, 10:03 PM
P: 0
Quote Quote by WannabeNewton View Post
So for some physical theory you want a respective theory that makes all the wrong predictions and fails to represent reality?
Kind of that, that is if it can be isolated and put into model form.
micromass
#17
Feb19-12, 10:05 PM
Mentor
micromass's Avatar
P: 18,346
Enough.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
More context for formula wanted General Math 0
String in a LQG context Beyond the Standard Model 1
What does b mean in this context? Classical Physics 2
EFEs in context Special & General Relativity 23
Can we broaden the context of science? General Discussion 50