Thread Closed

Science in Context

 
Share Thread
Feb19-12, 09:33 PM   #1
 

Science in Context


I've been thinking about the concept of clarity as it applies to science.

A white object is most clearly seen with a black background or context.

So how does that principle apply to science? In other words, with what context should we view science so we can see it most clearly?

Theoretically, going by the white-black principle, science should be seen in the context most opposite from it, so it can be seen the most clearly.

I'm sure there are many answers to this question.
PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com

>> A robot that runs like a cat (w/ Video)
>> Global cooling as significant as global warming, research shows
>> 'Chase and run' cell movement mechanism explains process of metastasis
Feb19-12, 09:39 PM   #2

Community 2012
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
I think this post needs more context to make any sense :)
Feb19-12, 09:42 PM   #3
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Can you give an example?
Feb19-12, 09:44 PM   #4
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 8

Science in Context


You're taking the metaphor way too far. But I'm waiting for the reasons why you made this post.

What do you think science is missing??
Feb19-12, 09:46 PM   #5

Best Humor 2012
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by mathscience View Post
I've been thinking about the concept of clarity as it applies to science.

A white object is most clearly seen with a black background or context.

So how does that principle apply to science? In other words, with what context should we view science so we can see it most clearly?

Theoretically, going by the white-black principle, science should be seen in the context most opposite from it, so it can be seen the most clearly.

I'm sure there are many answers to this question.
You are absolutely correct. I once photographed a white bird in the snow, and all you could see was a beady little eye.



Contrast!
Feb19-12, 09:51 PM   #6
 
Maybe politics. The global warming debate (banned on here) uses science in a political context. One could contend that politics isn't rational, so it stands in stark contrast to science.
Feb19-12, 09:52 PM   #7
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 8
But what are you proposing?? Isn't science good how it is now??
Feb19-12, 09:52 PM   #8
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
That seems pretty limited. What if you are talking about theoretical physics...what would you "contrast it with"...
Feb19-12, 09:53 PM   #9
Evo
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 4
Quote by mathscience View Post
Theoretically, going by the white-black principle, science should be seen in the context most opposite from it, so it can be seen the most clearly.
Explain what you mean by this.
Feb19-12, 09:57 PM   #10
 
Think of it in terms of Newton's principle. Equal and opposite. We must theoretically create an "anti-science" that is equal and opposite to the science were are thinking about. Just like you can't see something white if the background is also white.
Feb19-12, 09:59 PM   #11
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 8
Quote by mathscience View Post
Think of it in terms of Newton's principle. Equal and opposite. We must theoretically create an "anti-science" that is equal and opposite to the science were are thinking about. Just like you can't see something white if the background is also white.
And what must that anti-science consist of?? What do you propose??
Feb19-12, 10:00 PM   #12
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
So for some physical theory you want a respective theory that makes all the wrong predictions and fails to represent reality?
Feb19-12, 10:02 PM   #13
 
The opposite is religion.

Science is about knowing based on facts.
Religion is about knowing in the absence of facts (AKA faith).
Feb19-12, 10:02 PM   #14
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 8
Quote by WannabeNewton View Post
So for some physical theory you want a respective theory that makes all the wrong predictions and fails to represent reality?
No, he wants science books consisting of anti-particles.
Feb19-12, 10:03 PM   #15
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by micromass View Post
No, he wants science books consisting of anti-particles.
Sounds dangerous.
Feb19-12, 10:03 PM   #16
 
Quote by WannabeNewton View Post
So for some physical theory you want a respective theory that makes all the wrong predictions and fails to represent reality?
Kind of that, that is if it can be isolated and put into model form.
Feb19-12, 10:05 PM   #17
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 8
Enough.
Thread Closed

Similar Threads for: Science in Context
Thread Forum Replies
More context for formula wanted General Math 0
String in a LQG context Beyond the Standard Model 1
What does b mean in this context? Classical Physics 2
EFEs in context Special & General Relativity 23
Can we broaden the context of science? General Discussion 50