Science in Context


by mathscience
Tags: context, science
mathscience
mathscience is offline
#1
Feb19-12, 09:33 PM
P: 0
I've been thinking about the concept of clarity as it applies to science.

A white object is most clearly seen with a black background or context.

So how does that principle apply to science? In other words, with what context should we view science so we can see it most clearly?

Theoretically, going by the white-black principle, science should be seen in the context most opposite from it, so it can be seen the most clearly.

I'm sure there are many answers to this question.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Review: With Galaxy S5, Samsung proves less can be more
Making graphene in your kitchen
Study casts doubt on climate benefit of biofuels from corn residue
Pengwuino
Pengwuino is offline
#2
Feb19-12, 09:39 PM
PF Gold
Pengwuino's Avatar
P: 7,125
I think this post needs more context to make any sense :)
WannabeNewton
WannabeNewton is offline
#3
Feb19-12, 09:42 PM
C. Spirit
Sci Advisor
Thanks
WannabeNewton's Avatar
P: 4,933
Can you give an example?

micromass
micromass is online now
#4
Feb19-12, 09:44 PM
Mentor
micromass's Avatar
P: 16,662

Science in Context


You're taking the metaphor way too far. But I'm waiting for the reasons why you made this post.

What do you think science is missing??
OmCheeto
OmCheeto is offline
#5
Feb19-12, 09:46 PM
PF Gold
OmCheeto's Avatar
P: 1,370
Quote Quote by mathscience View Post
I've been thinking about the concept of clarity as it applies to science.

A white object is most clearly seen with a black background or context.

So how does that principle apply to science? In other words, with what context should we view science so we can see it most clearly?

Theoretically, going by the white-black principle, science should be seen in the context most opposite from it, so it can be seen the most clearly.

I'm sure there are many answers to this question.
You are absolutely correct. I once photographed a white bird in the snow, and all you could see was a beady little eye.



Contrast!
mathscience
mathscience is offline
#6
Feb19-12, 09:51 PM
P: 0
Maybe politics. The global warming debate (banned on here) uses science in a political context. One could contend that politics isn't rational, so it stands in stark contrast to science.
micromass
micromass is online now
#7
Feb19-12, 09:52 PM
Mentor
micromass's Avatar
P: 16,662
But what are you proposing?? Isn't science good how it is now??
WannabeNewton
WannabeNewton is offline
#8
Feb19-12, 09:52 PM
C. Spirit
Sci Advisor
Thanks
WannabeNewton's Avatar
P: 4,933
That seems pretty limited. What if you are talking about theoretical physics...what would you "contrast it with"...
Evo
Evo is offline
#9
Feb19-12, 09:53 PM
Mentor
Evo's Avatar
P: 25,945
Quote Quote by mathscience View Post
Theoretically, going by the white-black principle, science should be seen in the context most opposite from it, so it can be seen the most clearly.
Explain what you mean by this.
mathscience
mathscience is offline
#10
Feb19-12, 09:57 PM
P: 0
Think of it in terms of Newton's principle. Equal and opposite. We must theoretically create an "anti-science" that is equal and opposite to the science were are thinking about. Just like you can't see something white if the background is also white.
micromass
micromass is online now
#11
Feb19-12, 09:59 PM
Mentor
micromass's Avatar
P: 16,662
Quote Quote by mathscience View Post
Think of it in terms of Newton's principle. Equal and opposite. We must theoretically create an "anti-science" that is equal and opposite to the science were are thinking about. Just like you can't see something white if the background is also white.
And what must that anti-science consist of?? What do you propose??
WannabeNewton
WannabeNewton is offline
#12
Feb19-12, 10:00 PM
C. Spirit
Sci Advisor
Thanks
WannabeNewton's Avatar
P: 4,933
So for some physical theory you want a respective theory that makes all the wrong predictions and fails to represent reality?
DaveC426913
DaveC426913 is offline
#13
Feb19-12, 10:02 PM
DaveC426913's Avatar
P: 15,325
The opposite is religion.

Science is about knowing based on facts.
Religion is about knowing in the absence of facts (AKA faith).
micromass
micromass is online now
#14
Feb19-12, 10:02 PM
Mentor
micromass's Avatar
P: 16,662
Quote Quote by WannabeNewton View Post
So for some physical theory you want a respective theory that makes all the wrong predictions and fails to represent reality?
No, he wants science books consisting of anti-particles.
WannabeNewton
WannabeNewton is offline
#15
Feb19-12, 10:03 PM
C. Spirit
Sci Advisor
Thanks
WannabeNewton's Avatar
P: 4,933
Quote Quote by micromass View Post
No, he wants science books consisting of anti-particles.
Sounds dangerous.
mathscience
mathscience is offline
#16
Feb19-12, 10:03 PM
P: 0
Quote Quote by WannabeNewton View Post
So for some physical theory you want a respective theory that makes all the wrong predictions and fails to represent reality?
Kind of that, that is if it can be isolated and put into model form.
micromass
micromass is online now
#17
Feb19-12, 10:05 PM
Mentor
micromass's Avatar
P: 16,662
Enough.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
More context for formula wanted General Math 0
String in a LQG context Beyond the Standard Model 1
What does b mean in this context? Classical Physics 2
EFEs in context Special & General Relativity 23
Can we broaden the context of science? General Discussion 50