Recommended upper division classical physics books for selflearningby tamtam402 Tags: books, classical, division, physics, recommended, selflearning, upper 

#1
Mar412, 03:24 PM

P: 200

Hey guys, I'm an electrical engineering student with a strong interest in physics. I would like to work through classical mechanics, E&M, and thermodynamics books. I'm not sure if there's another subject that is usually covered in classical physics (perhaps waves/optics?) but if so, I'd like recommendations on these classes also.
What you should know about me: I've completed Calc I, II and III, linear algebra and an introductory statistics and probability course. I also purchased the book Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences by Mary L. Boas, and I'm currently working on it. I was told that the book should cover pretty much everything needed in undergrad physics. What I'd like to get out of the books: The books should be very clear since I won't have a teacher to help fill the gaps. The book should have a good selection of problems. Lastly, the book should cover the material usually seen by most physics undergrads. I know most mechanics and E&M courses are given during 2 semesters, so the book should be advanced enough to be used as a second course in the subject. Here are the books I have so far: Classical mechanics: ? E&M: Griffith Thermodynamics: ? waves/optics: ? 



#2
Mar412, 03:31 PM

P: 200

Oh yeah, one more thing. If you guys could recommend video lectures with the appropriate level for the book suggestions, that would be awesome. I know classical physics has a pretty standard order in which things are presented, so it should be fairly easy for me to match the video lectures with book sections.




#3
Mar412, 03:49 PM

P: 105

Taylor has a nice mechanics book. I've also heard good things about Marion/Thornton, although I haven't used it myself.




#4
Mar412, 05:13 PM

P: 496

Recommended upper division classical physics books for selflearning
I took a one semester classical mechanics class (our school condensed the two semester sequence into one long onesemester course) where we used Marion and Thornton. It is a brutal book to get through 11 of the 14ish chapters in one semester. It's very mathematical, but this can make certain things more clear. It isn't far from the level of Goldstein either, so if you get through this book I think you shouldn't have a problem getting through Goldstein (and one professor even recommended LandauLifgarbagez mechanics).
As for E&M, Griffith's is certainly the best book for that in my opinion. He explains things very clearly without leaving out any detail. There are end of section exercises that are somewhat straightforward, and then some very challenging problems at the end of the chapters. They will prepare you for Jackson if you do everything properly. Thermodynamics you should use Reif's book as it's something of the standard (kind of like Griffith's E&M). My course hasn't been using it but in past years my school has done so, and everything I've heard of the book has been very positive. I don't know anything about optics, but you also forgot quantum mechanics. I don't know if you plan on studying that, but if you do generally it's easier to tackle harder QM if you take a modern physics course. Also, I've mentioned being prepared for graduate physics, but I don't know if that is your intention. 



#5
Mar412, 05:28 PM

PF Gold
P: 3,173

For Optics the standard book here is Hecht's "Optics". I really like that book. You can't go wrong with that book in my opinion.
Edit: For a more advanced book on Optics, Born & Wolf's is also used. In Classical mechanics, Landau & Lifgarbagez's volume I is used as well as the already mentionned Goldstein in my university. For E&M we use Jackson's book and occasionally Griffith's book because our professor doesn't like the latter. We passed from ResnickHalliday's to Jackson in 1 semester, I couldn't handle the transition so I'll have to completly retake that course. Jackson is a tough one, but it's used as an upper undergraduate level textbook here. 



#6
Mar412, 09:18 PM

P: 14

Some may interpret this as an artifact of my lack of experience with other textbooks, but I cannot recommend Griffiths enough for E&M and quantum (I also like his elementary particles book, though I rarely hear people even mention that one). His style is very conversational, and I cannot imagine having tackled upperlevel E&M without him.




#7
Mar412, 09:23 PM

P: 1,025

E&M: Griffiths Quantum: Shankar + Griffiths but mostly Shankar. Thermal/Statistical Physics: Schroeder (although, if you are mathematically mature enough, you may not like it at all) Classical Mechanics: Taylor 



#8
Mar412, 09:34 PM

P: 14





#9
Mar412, 10:05 PM

P: 1,025





#10
Mar412, 11:02 PM

P: 496

For quantum mechanics, it would be easier to start out with a modern physics presentation I think. Or, if you like, tackle Griffith's first. The higher level after that would be, as someone else suggested also, Shankar. There is also Sakurai's (modern) quantum book which I've heard is on par with Shankar's.




#11
Mar412, 11:11 PM

P: 1,025





#12
Mar512, 12:54 AM

P: 246

http://www.youtube.com/user/Stanford...videos?view=pl I liked his classical mechanics lectures most. 



#13
Mar512, 03:41 AM

P: 6,863

For thermal. Kittel and Kroemer's Thermal Physics
Also Kittel wrote a book on Solid State that seems pretty good. 



#14
Mar512, 03:42 AM

P: 6,863

Also, can someone create some sort of wiki link that tracks this information?




#15
Mar512, 12:22 PM

P: 107

Have you taken introductory physics yet? If not, pick up both volumes of Physics by Resnick, Halliday, and Krane.
Before you attempt upper level physics, you should consult a textbook on ordinary and partial differential equations. The standard textbooks are Elementary Differential Equations with Boundary Value Problems by Penney and Edwards or Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems by Boyce and DiPrima. Either textbook will suffice, but be sure you purchase a version that includes "Boundary Value Problems" in its title. The Boas textbook is good, but I think you'll benefit more from learning the mathematics in a slightly more mathematical context. Now you're ready to tackle upper level physics. :) Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems  Marion and Thornton Electromagnetic Fields  Wangsness Optics  Hecht Principles of Quantum Mechanics  Shankar Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics  Reif Introduction to Solid State Physics  Kittel 



#16
Mar512, 03:42 PM

P: 200





#17
Mar512, 03:45 PM

P: 200

I have taken introductory (calculus based) mechanics, E&M and optics/waves. I'll look up the ODE/PDE textbooks. I have touched the subject in Calc III and in some of my EE courses but nothing very indepth.
Thanks everyone for the suggestions by the way, I really appreciate all the comments you guys gave me :D 



#18
Mar512, 08:55 PM

P: 6,863

The annoying thing is that there is more than enough raw stuff on the internet to allow someone to selfstudy an undergraduate physics degree. The problem is that I don't know of anyone that has put this together into one "package". Wikipedia is an example of how people can "selforganize" to create an encyclopedia, and I was wondering if there is a wiki page in which someone has organized all of this information to create a "do it yourself undergraduate physics degree." 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Recommended introductory books to Physics?  Science & Math Textbook Listings  3  
How hard are upper division physics courses compared to freshman physics?  Academic Guidance  22  
Upper Division Classical Mechanics for Dummies?  Science & Math Textbook Listings  8  
B+ in upper division physics class  Academic Guidance  8  
how do you know if you're smart enough to handle upper division physics?  Academic Guidance  11 