
#1
Mar812, 03:35 PM

P: 70

Is it possible for an event to occur in one POR and never occur in another POR?




#2
Mar812, 03:45 PM

P: 2,045

POR? You mean FOR frame of reference?
It sort of depends on what you mean by "event occurs in a FOR". The constantly acclerated observer's "reference frame" (accelerating forever), for example is disconnected from some portions of spacetime (creating an eventhorizon like surface, called the Rindler Horizon). Some events cannot even send light signals to this observer. In that sense, you could make some case for the event "not occurring" in this accelerated observer's reference frame. Perhaps more appropriate, however, would be to say that the accelerated observer's coordinates do not cover the entire manifold (it's only a coordinate patch), and so it really has more to do with the coordinates being local coordinates rather than global coordinates. Similar things occur in the Schwarzschild solution for events inside the event horizon and observers outside the event horizon. 



#3
Mar812, 04:25 PM

P: 70

I meant in FORs that move at constant speed (i took Point Of View and Frame Of Reference and 'meshed' them together, are they the same? LOL).




#4
Mar812, 05:03 PM

PF Gold
P: 4,524

Event questionSo if I could control the vocabulary, I would reserve PoV to mean what an observer can actually see and not allow it to be equal to FoR, but since I don't, you will have to figure out from the context or ask what a person means when they use the term PoV. But to answer your original question, in Special Relativity, there is no event that can occur in one FoR that does not occur in any other FoR you wish to choose. The Lorentz Transform has no limits on it for the events it can handle, just the limit on the value of vit has to be less than c. 



#5
Mar812, 06:12 PM

P: 2,045

ghwells, it seems you are restricting frames to global inertial reference frames, isn't that too restrictive? Surely, what an accelerating observer can measure by putting rigid rulers and clocks in his accelerating rocket should still count as a reference frame...albeit a local one.




#6
Mar812, 06:17 PM

PF Gold
P: 4,524





#7
Mar812, 08:42 PM

P: 1,555

Similar when the Sun is beyond a horizon it can no longer be seen. :) 



#8
Mar912, 01:36 PM

P: 70

OK, at this point I will take the answer as "No, if you, 'the measurer', move at constant speed, and an event occurred, it is not possible that you will never be able to observe that event." My intent is to take the question further, to perhaps another direction. To be continued soon, or aborted if not able to ask more in what seems coherent terms.




#9
Mar912, 02:02 PM

P: 1,555





#10
Mar912, 02:15 PM

P: 70

Here we go with the emotional stuff. Yes, i read what you wrote and if you had not wasted the time berating me, but instead jut repeat again and again as much as needed, probably i would already get it. Yes, since i already read what you wrote please try to rephrase it or let other people explain what i dont understand.




#11
Mar912, 02:18 PM

P: 70

OK, i will stop asking until I will be sure i understand the answer to the first question.




#12
Mar912, 02:22 PM

P: 1,555

One example is events that take place inside a black hole outsiders cannot observe these.




#13
Mar912, 02:27 PM

P: 70

Great, and besides black holes? Any other example that exclude a black hole scenario? thanks.




#14
Mar912, 02:30 PM

P: 1,555





#15
Mar912, 02:34 PM

P: 70

OK so we have: outside the observable universe and black holes. This still enables me to ask further, i think. Any other possibilities?




#16
Mar912, 02:41 PM

P: 1,555





#17
Mar912, 02:47 PM

P: 70

OK. Please look at the attached diagram. Will any spaceship from the group 'spaceship x', observe any change in light speed, before or after light enters detectors d1 and d2, located on spaceship3?




#18
Mar912, 02:52 PM

P: 2,045

The three common "event horizons" to appear are those for black holes, the one for the observable universe, and the Rindler's horizon for accelerating observers.
None of these can really be fully dealt with using only special relativity. In the Rindler's case, one can do some of the analysis using only SR. One can, for example, deduce that constantly accelerated observers travel on hyperbolas. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
'Any event' and 'more than one event' question  Calculus & Beyond Homework  0  
Question of event horizons  Cosmology  19  
Show that if event A is completely independent of Event B  Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics  3  
Independent event and mutually exclusive event  Calculus & Beyond Homework  3 