Register to reply

Isomorphism of relatively prime groups

by PennState666
Tags: isomorphism, relative prime
Share this thread:
PennState666
#1
Mar8-12, 05:36 PM
P: 18
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Allow m,n to be two relatively prime integers. You must prove that Z(sub mn) ≈ Z(sub m) x Z(sub n)


2. Relevant equations
if two groups form an isomorphism they must be onto, 1-1, and preserve the operation.


3. The attempt at a solution
since m and n are relatively prime, the gcd(m, n) = 1.
mhm, very stumped from the start.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
NASA team lays plans to observe new worlds
IHEP in China has ambitions for Higgs factory
Spinach could lead to alternative energy more powerful than Popeye
jbunniii
#2
Mar8-12, 07:50 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
jbunniii's Avatar
P: 3,166
What do you know about the group Z(sub mn)? What are some facts about it? Is it abelian, etc.?
PennState666
#3
Mar8-12, 08:42 PM
P: 18
Isomorphisms isnt my thing, I do not know many facts about Z(sub mn). I can say the contents of Z(sub mn) are {[0],[1], [2],.... [mn]}. generated by a single element? Im not sure...Abelian? yes i believe so...

jbunniii
#4
Mar8-12, 09:11 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
jbunniii's Avatar
P: 3,166
Isomorphism of relatively prime groups

Quote Quote by PennState666 View Post
Isomorphisms isnt my thing, I do not know many facts about Z(sub mn). I can say the contents of Z(sub mn) are {[0],[1], [2],.... [mn]}. generated by a single element? Im not sure...Abelian? yes i believe so...
Yes, generated by a single element is the key. In other words, it's a cyclic group. (Side note: cyclic groups are always abelian, but you don't need that fact for this problem.)

So if Z(sub mn) is isomorphic to Z(sub m) x Z(sub n), then that group would also have to be cyclic, right? Can you show that Z(sub m) x Z(sub n) is cyclic?
PennState666
#5
Mar9-12, 08:24 AM
P: 18
mhmm i believe so, but i dont know where to start since I am dealing with a cross product...
Office_Shredder
#6
Mar9-12, 09:42 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 4,500
If you had to guess at which element of ZmxZn generated the whole group, what would it be?

If you're not sure, try some small examples like Z2xZ3 or Z3xZ4 and see what you can come up with
PennState666
#7
Mar9-12, 07:17 PM
P: 18
What would the elements of Z2 x Z3 look like again?
kru_
#8
Mar9-12, 08:27 PM
P: 85
Ordered pairs (a, b) such that a is from Z2, and b is from Z3.
jbunniii
#9
Mar9-12, 08:30 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
jbunniii's Avatar
P: 3,166
Quote Quote by PennState666 View Post
What would the elements of Z2 x Z3 look like again?
Well, if A and B are any sets (whether or not they have a group structure), then what is the definition of A x B? This is called the Cartesian product of A and B. The elements are simply ordered pairs of the form [itex](a,b)[/itex], where [itex]a \in A[/itex] and [itex]b \in B[/itex].

And if A and B are groups, then there's a natural way to define a group operation on A x B.

Surely this is discussed in your textbook or lecture? There's no way you can proceed with this problem without first understanding what the group is.
PennState666
#10
Mar10-12, 12:04 AM
P: 18
yes of course I just wanted to be refreshed and reassured...
Z2 x Z3 = {([0],[0]), ([0],[1]), ([0],[2]), ([1],[0]), ([1],[1]), ([1],[2])}...
I cannot grasp how this could be generated by a single element though?
jbunniii
#11
Mar10-12, 12:40 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
jbunniii's Avatar
P: 3,166
Quote Quote by PennState666 View Post
yes of course I just wanted to be refreshed and reassured...
Z2 x Z3 = {([0],[0]), ([0],[1]), ([0],[2]), ([1],[0]), ([1],[1]), ([1],[2])}...
I cannot grasp how this could be generated by a single element though?
Look at the six elements. In order for the group to be generated by one element, clearly that element can't have a [0] in either of the two positions of the ordered pair. So that only leaves two candidates: either ([1],[1]) or ([1],[2]). Why not try each and see if it works? Just add it to itself over and over and see if you can generate the group.
PennState666
#12
Mar11-12, 12:03 PM
P: 18
the generator for the group Z(sub 2) x Z(sub 3) = <[1],[1]> and since the operation is addition, the generator for a group in the form Zn x Zm = <[1], [1]>. so Zn x Zm is cyclic and abelian.
jbunniii
#13
Mar11-12, 08:03 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
jbunniii's Avatar
P: 3,166
Quote Quote by PennState666 View Post
the generator for the group Z(sub 2) x Z(sub 3) = <[1],[1]> and since the operation is addition, the generator for a group in the form Zn x Zm = <[1], [1]>. so Zn x Zm is cyclic and abelian.
OK, good. Note that <[1],[2]> also generates the group.

So Z2 x Z3 is cyclic, and I assume you observed that it has order 6. That looks promising, because Z6 is also cyclic with order 6.

Now you need to define an isomorphism [itex]\phi: Z_{6} \rightarrow Z_2 \times Z_3[/itex] between the groups. As a first step, I suggest choosing a generator [itex]g[/itex] for [itex]Z_6[/itex] and defining [itex]\phi(g)[/itex].


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Isomorphism with z sub prime# Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
How to show an isomorphism between groups?! Linear & Abstract Algebra 1
Isomorphism to C_n with n prime Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
Relatively prime isomorphism groups Calculus & Beyond Homework 10
Groups - Isomorphism Calculus & Beyond Homework 2