Proposed Bill Would Outlaw Facebook Account Access As Employment Requirement


by Greg Bernhardt
Tags: access, account, employment, facebook, outlaw, proposed, requirement
Greg Bernhardt
Greg Bernhardt is offline
#1
Mar22-12, 08:00 PM
Admin
Greg Bernhardt's Avatar
P: 8,534
Last night in class, as we were discussing privacy issues, which is always a hot topic. Someone raised the very disturbing news that employers have begun to demand access to applicants’ Facebook profiles as a condition of considering them for … Continue reading →

Read More...
Phys.Org News Partner Social sciences news on Phys.org
Study finds law dramatically curbing need for speed
Newlyweds, be careful what you wish for
Can new understanding avert tragedy?
Evo
Evo is offline
#2
Mar22-12, 08:13 PM
Mentor
Evo's Avatar
P: 25,928
Don't post stupid stuff online.
Pyrrhus
Pyrrhus is offline
#3
Mar22-12, 11:27 PM
HW Helper
Pyrrhus's Avatar
P: 2,280
Anything you post in social sites such as Facebook is no longer your property. It says so on the Terms you agree when you open the account. This is why the best you can do is to avoid any social networking sites.

Kholdstare
Kholdstare is offline
#4
Mar23-12, 02:36 AM
P: 390

Proposed Bill Would Outlaw Facebook Account Access As Employment Requirement


Ban the Facebook - Its a complete waste of time. Physicsforums is way better.
emailanmol
emailanmol is offline
#5
Mar23-12, 03:04 AM
P: 297
Quote Quote by Kholdstare View Post
Ban the Facebook - Its a complete waste of time. Physicsforums is way better.
Lol.
I would disagree with point that facebook is a waste of time.

I met so many of my childhood friends whom I had totally lost contact with.
Its an amazing privelege to know them after years.Facebook has several merits but has its downsides too.
Like employers asking for access to account is like insane. Its employers fault not facebook's :P
Pengwuino
Pengwuino is offline
#6
Mar23-12, 03:37 AM
PF Gold
Pengwuino's Avatar
P: 7,125
Agreed. Facebook should be banned.
Aziraphale
Aziraphale is offline
#7
Mar23-12, 01:52 PM
P: 4
@Evo: I wrote that article (it's from my blog). What specifically about the post is stupid? How could I make it less so?

@Pyrrhus: That's not exactly true. If you read it closely, you don't give up ALL intellectual property rights to your content when you post it, you just give Facebook a worldwide license to use your content so they can display it to people who want to see it. It's really more about the technicalities of providing the service they do than a malevolent scheme to steal your ideas. Furthermore, your suggestion for avoiding social networking sites also implies that people should avoid sites like PF, a place where you've posted >2,000 times. You clearly like the idea of a site where people can share ideas about physics, science and other topics, so why hate on Facebook just because it caters to an audience that isn't so specific?
jtbell
jtbell is offline
#8
Mar23-12, 02:37 PM
Mentor
jtbell's Avatar
P: 11,231
Quote Quote by Aziraphale View Post
@Evo: I wrote that article (it's from my blog). What specifically about the post is stupid? How could I make it less so?
I'm pretty sure she was making a general statement about people posting stuff that reflects poorly on them, and not referring to you at all.

You clearly like the idea of a site where people can share ideas about physics, science and other topics, so why hate on Facebook just because it caters to an audience that isn't so specific?
A big difference between Facebook and PF is that we don't require people to identify themselves with their real names, addresses and other personal information.
chemisttree
chemisttree is offline
#9
Mar23-12, 02:48 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
chemisttree's Avatar
P: 3,725
Quote Quote by jtbell View Post
I'm pretty sure she was making a general statement about people posting stuff that reflects poorly on them, and not referring to you at all.
For a second I though she was referring to Greg's post. Only a second!
Aziraphale
Aziraphale is offline
#10
Mar23-12, 02:57 PM
P: 4
Quote Quote by jtbell View Post
I'm pretty sure she was making a general statement about people posting stuff that reflects poorly on them, and not referring to you at all.



A big difference between Facebook and PF is that we don't require people to identify themselves with their real names, addresses and other personal information.
Of course. I see it now. [wipes egg off face]
jtbell
jtbell is offline
#11
Mar23-12, 03:03 PM
Mentor
jtbell's Avatar
P: 11,231
Facebook threatens to sue employers who pull this trick:

http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/23/tech/s...html?hpt=hp_t3
chrisbaird
chrisbaird is offline
#12
Mar23-12, 03:11 PM
P: 617
The last thing we need are more laws. Isn't this what unions are supposed to be for (or used to be), to protect employers from unfair employees? The job interviewee should just have the courage to say, "the details of my personal life will not effect my job performance, so it is none of your business." A good employer will like that kind of a response.
Evo
Evo is offline
#13
Mar23-12, 03:15 PM
Mentor
Evo's Avatar
P: 25,928
Quote Quote by Aziraphale View Post
@Evo: I wrote that article (it's from my blog). What specifically about the post is stupid? How could I make it less so?
Oh no, sorry, I was referring to people posting stupid personal stuff online, like FB. I've been telling people for years that even if you delete it, you have no idea where it could be copied. Nothing against you. I have a bad habit of being WAY too brief with my posts, after all, *I* know what I mean.
Pengwuino
Pengwuino is offline
#14
Mar23-12, 03:32 PM
PF Gold
Pengwuino's Avatar
P: 7,125
Quote Quote by chrisbaird View Post
The last thing we need are more laws. Isn't this what unions are supposed to be for (or used to be), to protect employers from unfair employees? The job interviewee should just have the courage to say, "the details of my personal life will not effect my job performance, so it is none of your business." A good employer will like that kind of a response.
But you're not an employee yet at the job interview, which this action is suppose to be for :). And I think most people realize that the details of your personal life CAN affect ones job performance. That's why you won't be surprised to see anyone who works with money having their credit checked, people who work with kids or in important government jobs getting a background check, and tons of jobs have drug tests.
JonDE
JonDE is offline
#15
Mar25-12, 01:06 PM
P: 58
Quote Quote by Evo View Post
Oh no, sorry, I was referring to people posting stupid personal stuff online, like FB. I've been telling people for years that even if you delete it, you have no idea where it could be copied. Nothing against you. I have a bad habit of being WAY too brief with my posts, after all, *I* know what I mean.
Going along these lines a little, without hopefully going too far off topic. I had a friend who got fired for posting something on facebook after a hard day at work. It was copied by a customer and sent to corporate, she was terminated the next day.
SHISHKABOB
SHISHKABOB is offline
#16
Mar26-12, 09:41 AM
P: 615
Quote Quote by JonDE View Post
Going along these lines a little, without hopefully going too far off topic. I had a friend who got fired for posting something on facebook after a hard day at work. It was copied by a customer and sent to corporate, she was terminated the next day.
imagine if she had gone into the lunch room and said the same things very loudly in conversation with some people

it's the same exact thing, Facebook is as public as private as you make it. If the person has friends that she doesn't trust... then she should be more careful with what she says on facebook, since lots of people can see it.

IMO: facebook is pretty dumb, I mostly think this because I'm not really a socializing type of dude and am the opposite of interested in meeting old friends that... I am no longer friends with.
turbo
turbo is online now
#17
Mar26-12, 11:17 AM
PF Gold
turbo's Avatar
P: 7,367
A young woman at my wife's place of employment ranted on Facebook about how "stupid" her co-workers are and how they "couldn't even manage to get jobs at WalMart". No contest - she was gone the next day.
Pyrrhus
Pyrrhus is offline
#18
Mar26-12, 04:40 PM
HW Helper
Pyrrhus's Avatar
P: 2,280
The problem is more the evidence rather than what you say. It is worse reading it rather than hearing it. Sound is gone without a trace, but words written are always there. It is a perception issue.

In my opinion, laws will continue to change and the concept of privacy as we get too close with each other through the internet. Frankly, I like to keep my distance.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Bill proposed to block public access to publicly funded research General Discussion 54
Asking for a woman's Facebook account instead of number. Relationships 3