What is the role of complex numbers in physics?

In summary: In fact, you can have complex number in higher dimensions - an infinite number in fact (ex: 3d quaternion) where i^2 = j^2 = k^2 = -1. However, you do not combine them: a + bi + cj + dk != a + (b + c + d)i and the multiplication of two quaternions is noncommutative. Quaternions can be useful in making 3d video games because of the way they work.All in all, putting complex numbers on
  • #1
johann1301
217
1
In my math class, were having presentations about any topic from our curriculum. I want to talk about Complex numbers role in physics, but i don't know anything about its role. Can anyone tell me some areas were its important/used;) I know Feynman used them, but i don't know why. Anybody know something?

Thanks;)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
Look at the solution of an underdamped harmonic oscillator in (see page 2):

http://www.brynmawr.edu/physics/DJCross/docs/misc/dho.pdf

The general form of the solution is an exponential with a complex number argument:
[tex] x(t)=Ae^{\left(-a\pm i\omega \right)t} [/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
Complex numbers are numbers in the plane and can be a useful mathematical tool in many physics and engineering problems and theories (electrical, control theory, and quantum theory). In fact, you can have complex number in higher dimensions - an infinite number in fact (ex: 3d quaternion) where i^2 = j^2 = k^2 = -1. However, you do not combine them: a + bi + cj + dk != a + (b + c + d)i and the multiplication of two quaternions is noncommutative. Quaternions can be useful in making 3d video games because of the way they work.

All in all, putting complex numbers on the complex plane was the biggest discovery I think when someone found that i = 1 /_ 90-degrees. As such, complex numbers can embody angles/trigonometry and can be employed in problems involving oscillations/frequency. Often, in engineering, the laplace transform is taken of your mass-spring-damper system (or other type of system) to change t (time) into i*w (frequency). This is a neat trick that greatly simplifies the mathematics.
 
  • #5
i = 1 /_ 90-degrees

What does the underscore represent?
 
  • #6
Sorry I was trying to draw an angle symbol, i = 1 "angle" 90°

In other words, the imaginary axis is perpendicular to the real axis.
 
  • #7
johann1301 said:
In my math class, were having presentations about any topic from our curriculum. I want to talk about Complex numbers role in physics, but i don't know anything about its role. Can anyone tell me some areas were its important/used;) I know Feynman used them, but i don't know why. Anybody know something?

Thanks;)

Complex numbers are really good with oscillating systems, like waves or oscillators. Quantum mechanics would be really messy without complex numbers. Electromagnetic radiation (light, radio waves, etc) uses complex numbers.

The main thing about complex numbers is "closure". For example, the square root is not "closed" in the real number system. That means that there are some real numbers that you cannot take the square root of, like -1. In the complex number system, the square root is "closed". Every complex number has a square root.

More generally, if x^y are real numbers, there are some real numbers for which this expression has no answer. In the complex number system, every expression of the form x^y gives a complex number. This makes the math really simple, every time you run into x^y, you don't have to worry about whether it exists or not. It always does.

Thats why it works so well in many physics problems. If you do the physics in complex numbers, you can do the simplified math, and when you get your result, if you did it right, that result will be a real number.
 
  • #8
Very well said Rap!

Oh, I want to add one thing... when you transform t --> i*w, you will often see this as "s". So do not be confused because s = i*w

t: time domain
s: frequency domain (much simpler mathematics for problems that involve oscillations like alternating current or quantum wave functions)
 
Last edited:
  • #9
It was Wessel who discovered that √-1 is the unit length 90° to the real axis.

The proof goes like this:

Since I do not have an "angle" symbol, I will use "<" to mean angle.

Imagine (no pun intended) that there is a line segment with length L and direction θ that represents √-1.

In other words, √-1 = L < θ

If you square both sides, you get: -1 = L*L < 2θ

Now, we know from the unit circle that: -1 = 1 < 180°

The LHS of both these equations are the same! L*L < 2θ = 1 < 180°

Therefore, L = 1 and 2θ = 180° --> θ = 90°

Plug this back into our first equation and we find √-1 = 1 < 90° !

So i = √-1 is the "unit" of length that is perpendicular to the real axis.
 

1. What are complex numbers and how are they used in physics?

Complex numbers are numbers that have both a real and imaginary part. In physics, they are often used to represent quantities that have both magnitude and direction, such as electric and magnetic fields. They are also used in quantum mechanics to represent the wave function of a quantum system.

2. Can complex numbers be physically interpreted?

No, complex numbers cannot be physically interpreted as they are mathematical constructs. However, they are useful for solving physical problems and predicting the behavior of physical systems.

3. How do complex numbers relate to the concept of phase in physics?

In physics, phase is a measure of the position of a wave cycle relative to a fixed point. Complex numbers are often used to represent the phase of a wave, with the imaginary part representing the phase angle. This allows for a more compact and elegant representation of physical phenomena.

4. Are there any physical phenomena that can only be described using complex numbers?

Yes, many physical phenomena, particularly in quantum mechanics, can only be accurately described using complex numbers. This is because complex numbers allow for the representation of both magnitude and direction, which is necessary for describing the behavior of particles at the quantum level.

5. Are there any drawbacks to using complex numbers in physics?

One potential drawback is that complex numbers can be more difficult to interpret and visualize compared to real numbers. Additionally, some physical theories that involve complex numbers may not have experimental evidence to support them. However, the utility and accuracy of using complex numbers in physics has been well-established and widely accepted in the scientific community.

Similar threads

  • Classical Physics
Replies
13
Views
902
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
907
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
2
Views
978
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top