| New Reply |
Proper summation notation |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Mar27-12, 02:05 PM | #1 |
|
|
Proper summation notation
Hi
Is it correct of me to say that I want to carry out the sum [tex] \sum_i{v_iw_i} [/tex] where [itex]i\in\{x,y,z\}[/itex]? Or is it most correct to say that [itex]i=\{x,y,z\}[/itex]? Best regards, Niles. |
| Mar27-12, 02:18 PM | #2 |
|
|
If you have the sum
[tex] v_x w_x + v_y w_y + v_z w_z[/tex] then you want [itex] i \in \{ x,y,z \} [/itex], which says sum over every element of the set [itex] \{x,y,z \}[/itex]. If you wrote [tex] \sum_{i=\{x,y,z \}} v_i w_i[/tex] what you really just wrote is [tex] v_{ \{x,y,z \}} w_{ \{x,y,z \}}[/tex] which is strange because it's not a sum, and because indices are unlikely (but might be) sets of variables |
| Mar27-12, 02:20 PM | #3 |
|
|
Thanks, that is also what I thought was the case. I see the "i={x,y,z}"-version in all sorts of books.
Best wishes, Niles. |
| Mar27-12, 08:49 PM | #4 |
|
|
Proper summation notationThis is just my opinion, but the reason is mostly conventional because its easier for everyone with a simple mathematics background to understand and causes less confusion. |
| Mar28-12, 02:19 AM | #5 |
|
|
Thanks for the help, that is kind of everybody.
Best, Niles. |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Proper summation notation
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Summation notation | General Math | 2 | ||
| Summation Notation. | General Math | 3 | ||
| Summation Notation | Special & General Relativity | 2 | ||
| Proper notation on this site | General Physics | 1 | ||
| Summation notation | Precalculus Mathematics Homework | 6 | ||