Register to reply

Electro weak vertices

by Jodahr
Tags: electro, vertices, weak
Share this thread:
Jodahr
#1
Mar29-12, 03:02 PM
P: 10
I have a question about Feynman Diagrams:

let's say we have a process: up antidown -> W+ -> up antidown...

the first vertex is like V_CKM G PL ( mixing, gamma, projector)
the second is the same..only with the complex conjugate CKM matrix...
but why?...

If I compute the M* I have to bar the vertices..and there I got the same vertex..with the same flow..but there I would change PL to PR and interchange PL and Gamma..why is that the case?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists unlock nature of high-temperature superconductivity
Serial time-encoded amplified microscopy for ultrafast imaging based on multi-wavelength laser
Measuring the smallest magnets: Physicists measured magnetic interactions between single electrons
francesco85
#2
Mar30-12, 03:19 AM
P: 62
Quote Quote by Jodahr View Post
I have a question about Feynman Diagrams:

let's say we have a process: up antidown -> W+ -> up antidown...

the first vertex is like V_CKM G PL ( mixing, gamma, projector)
the second is the same..only with the complex conjugate CKM matrix...
but why?...

If I compute the M* I have to bar the vertices..and there I got the same vertex..with the same flow..but there I would change PL to PR and interchange PL and Gamma..why is that the case?
Hello, in my opinion the answer is the following: the Feynman diagram you are considering is composed of two vertices: in the first an up is destroyed, an antidown is destroyed and a W+ is created; in the second vertex an up is created, an antidown is created and a W+ is destroyed; so, roughly speaking, the first is associated with a term in the lagrangian like (u dbar W-), while the second with (ubar d W+), that is its hermitian conjugate (of course I have forgot all the contraction matrices...); this is the origin of the conjugation of the CKM matrix paramters (and, of course, one should be careful with the imaginary units!)
Best,
Francesco
AdrianTheRock
#3
Mar30-12, 07:03 AM
P: 136
I think another way of looking at it is like this.

That Feynman diagram also describes the processes
u → W+ + d
W+ + d → u
as all I have done here is replace the incoming anti-d with an outgoing d, and the outgoing anti-d with an incoming d.

The CKM matrix, as defined, is the factor for 'converting' down-type quarks to up-type, eg
|u> = Vud |d>
Provided only the three known generations of quarks exist, the CKM matrix must be unitary, and hence
V-1 = V
so
|d> = V*ud |u>


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Is electro-weak force intermediate for strong force happening? High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 4
What if electro-weak symmetry is broken at all energies? High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 4
A Question About Weinberg's Electro-Weak Lagrangian General Physics 3
Number of Graphs on n vertices without isolated vertices Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
Nuetralization Reaction involving a weak acid and weak base Chemistry 3