Register to reply

Bell-state Measurements

by StevieTNZ
Tags: bellstate, measurements
Share this thread:
StevieTNZ
#1
Mar27-12, 04:37 PM
PF Gold
StevieTNZ's Avatar
P: 794
In entanglement swapping:

If we detect photons 2 and 3 in the following states |135>|45> or |45>|135> (accompanied by the appropriate coincidence counts), do we project photons 1 and 4 into the same bell-state (so photons 1 and 4 are also found in either |135>|45> or |45>|135>)?

How would we write this four photon GHZ state in terms of |V> and |H> polarisation? Would it be |H>|V>|H>|V> (+ OR -?) |V>|H>|V>|H>?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_state
We have a list of the four bell states.
Taking the first, do we expand as:
|A>|B> = |0>|1> + |1>|0> ? Which would be |H>|V> + |V>|H>?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
New study refines biological evolution model
Fiber optic light pipes in the retina do much more than simple image transfer
Production phase for LSST camera sensors nears
StevieTNZ
#2
Mar29-12, 08:13 PM
PF Gold
StevieTNZ's Avatar
P: 794
Looking over it being |V>|H>|V>|H> - |H>|V>|H>|V>:

Would the following basis in 45/135 be the only ones allowed:
|45>|135>|45>|135>;
|135>|135>|45>|45>;
|135>|45>|135>|45>;
|45>|45>|135>|135>

In all honesty I don't know how these are calculated. Two H's expanded in |135> make a +, because they're both - 135.
Do we expand over |V>|H>|V>|H> then minus that result by what we get for |H>|V>|H>|V>? Or is it all done in one go?
StevieTNZ
#3
Mar29-12, 08:55 PM
PF Gold
StevieTNZ's Avatar
P: 794
Okay, I think I've figured it out. Appropriately detecting 2 and 3 in |45>|135> etc to create that bell state, and throwing 1 and 4 into the same bell state we get this GHZ state:
|V>|H>|H>|V> - |H>|V>|V>|H>

which allows the following combinations in 45/135 basis:
|45>|135>|45>|45>
|135>|135>|45>|135>
|135>|45>|135>|135>
|45>|45>|135>|45>

EDIT: corrected last |..> to say |45> rather than |135>

zonde
#4
Apr1-12, 11:36 PM
PF Gold
P: 1,376
Bell-state Measurements

Let's write |45> as C for short and |135> as D.
So then [itex]|H\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(C+D)[/itex] and [itex]|V\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(C-D)[/itex]
Now [itex]|V_1\rangle|H_2\rangle|H_3\rangle|V_4\rangle - |H_1\rangle|V_2\rangle|V_3\rangle|H_4\rangle=[/itex]
[itex]=\frac{1}{4}(C_1-D_1)(C_2+D_2)(C_3+D_3)(C_4-D_4)-\frac{1}{4}(C_1+D_1)(C_2-D_2)(C_3-D_3)(C_4+D_4)[/itex]
That results in 32 terms where 8 term will cancel with other 8 terms and 8 terms will add with last 8 terms. So you will have 8 terms like that:
[tex]-D_1C_2C_3C_4+C_1D_2C_3C_4+C_1C_2D_3C_4-D_1D_2D_3C_4-C_1C_2C_3D_4+D_1D_2C_3D_4+D_1C_2D_3D_4-C_1D_2D_3D_4[/tex]

As you can see these are terms with odd number of C and D. If you would swap - for + in the initial expression you would get terms with even number of C and D.
StevieTNZ
#5
Apr2-12, 02:15 AM
PF Gold
StevieTNZ's Avatar
P: 794
Okay, I see now. If we start off with photons entangled as |H>V|> - |V>|H>, and we detect photons 2 and 3 (one from each pair) in this bell state: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...76cca077a2.png
I would assume in this bell-state measuring in 45/135 basis, we would detect |45>|135> or |135>|45>

What is the overall GHZ state now?
Is it |V>|H>|V>|H> + |H>|V>|H>|V> ?
StevieTNZ
#6
Apr2-12, 02:11 PM
PF Gold
StevieTNZ's Avatar
P: 794
I'm guessing the GHZ state will be |V>|H>|H>|V> - |H>|V>|V>|H>, upon projecting 2 and 3 into the bell state http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...76cca077a2.png (which projects 1 and 4 into the same bell-state).
zonde
#7
Apr2-12, 10:57 PM
PF Gold
P: 1,376
Quote Quote by StevieTNZ View Post
I would assume in this bell-state measuring in 45/135 basis, we would detect |45>|135> or |135>|45>
Why do you think so?


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Justify bell state Quantum Physics 0
Bell tests: Singlet vs Triplet State Quantum Physics 2
Bell Measurement on 3-qubit GHZ state? Quantum Physics 0
I need clarification about Bell state Measurements Quantum Physics 3