Register to reply

Does Relativistic effect applies to light as well?

by nikeadidas
Tags: applies, effect, light, relativistic
Share this thread:
nikeadidas
#1
Apr4-12, 05:17 AM
P: 15
A quick question..a traveller will observe length of his journey contracted if he is travelling in a straight line..thus when light travels, doesn't the distance it travels get contracted?..and since light itself travels at c, ideally the contraction factor should be zero, so light should reach instantly..I am not sure what am I missing..plz help
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Experts defend operational earthquake forecasting, counter critiques
EU urged to convert TV frequencies to mobile broadband
Sierra Nevada freshwater runoff could drop 26 percent by 2100
HallsofIvy
#2
Apr4-12, 06:51 AM
Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 39,568
If an "observer" were able to travel at the speed of light, distances would be reduced to 0. Further, time would reduced to a standstill. In other words, the is NO usable "frame of reference" at light speed.
harrylin
#3
Apr4-12, 07:01 AM
P: 3,187
You surely mean that the contraction factor should be infinite (resulting in zero length).

The equations refer to reference systems and no reference system can reach the speed of light - and infinites would not be very useful. But if one could closely approach the speed of light, indeed one would be at one's destiny "in no time" or instantly. So, perhaps there is nothing that you missed, and you discovered the concept of "time dilation".

Einstein phrased it as follows:

"For v=c all moving objects—viewed from the “stationary” system—shrivel up into plane figures. [..] we shall [..] find in what follows, that the velocity of light in our theory plays the part, physically, of an infinitely great velocity."
and
"the time marked by the clock (viewed in the stationary system) is slow by 1-sqrt{1-v^2/c^2} seconds per second".
- http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/

Note: it could be that there's a thingy with your formulation "get contracted": you should have written "appears to be contracted for the light". It's essential to keep track of who/which system (although light isn't either) measures what and when!


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Magnetism as a relativistic effect Special & General Relativity 5
Planck relation, relativistic doppler effect, and relativistic mass Special & General Relativity 4
Relativistic Doppler effect Introductory Physics Homework 1
Confuse about the relativistic effect Special & General Relativity 6
Relativistic Doppler Effect Advanced Physics Homework 2