Register to reply

Synthetic beings ?

by phylotree
Tags: beings, synthetic
Share this thread:
Apr4-12, 10:07 PM
P: 50
Synthetic bacteria have been created, which isn't new anymore,

But I don't know how to correctly define "synthetic" in this work. Are those synthetic bacteria possessing complete identities as those in nature ? Did they try out the bacteria's most observable behaviors ? I am interested in cooperative activities in bacteria reproduction and replication.
Phys.Org News Partner Biology news on
Sheepdogs use just two simple rules to round up large herds of sheep
Monarch butterflies plummet 90 percent, need protection
And then there were 10?unexpected diversity in New Zealand kanuka genus Kunzea
Apr18-12, 08:45 AM
P: 9
The M. mycoides synthetic genome is considered "synthetic" because the DNA used began in a DNA synthesis machine, using lab chemistry techniques to produce it. The actual genome was pretty much a replica of the natural one, with some "watermark" DNA added to uniquely identify it by the creators (like the watermark on money, or the signature on a work of art).

If i remember correctly they may have deleted some DNA that they considered unnecessary, but it was largely just like copy-paste.

The same folks, JCVI, have also been interested for a while in a minimal genome, and had talked of deleting as much DNA as possible while still retaining self-replication and growth of cells.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Why do living beings die? Biology 35
Dimensional Beings/Entities General Discussion 16
Superior Beings General Discussion 37
Beings from other worlds General Physics 9
Heirarchy of beings General Discussion 1