eccentricity of orbits and gravitational energyby sk9 Tags: eccentricity, gravitation, orbit, velocity 

#1
Apr512, 02:56 PM

P: 16

hello. i recently came across this question in which a satellite is put into orbit at a point around a planet with velocity 1.2V, where V is the speed for a circular orbit at that point and they ask for ratio of max to min distance. [Ans. 2.57]
what i want to know is how do we relate eccentricity to the velocity in these type of cases 



#2
Apr612, 02:14 AM

Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
P: 9,162

Let the initial radius and velocity be r1, v1 (assume tangential only).
Let the max radius and corresponding velocity be r2, v2. The gravitational potential at radius r is g/r, some constant g. You can write the down the total energy at min and max radius in terms of the above, since r' = 0 at r1 and r2, and by conservation of energy equate them. By conservation of angular momentum, r1v1 = r2v2. If v is the speed for circular orbit at radius r1 then the centripetal force v^2/r1 = g/(r1^2). We are told v1 = K.v where K = 1.2. From the above equations you should obtain r2/r1 = K^2/(1K^2) = 2.57.... 



#3
Apr612, 03:46 PM

P: 16

two things
1) what is r' = 0 2)i understand tha r1 is the initial radius, but in last step you have used it for min distance which it cannot be becauseat min distance all its velocity must be perpendicular. Thanks btw!! 



#4
Apr612, 04:12 PM

Mentor
P: 14,456

eccentricity of orbits and gravitational energyThe correct result is [itex]r_2/r_1 = K^2/(2K^2)[/itex] . 



#5
Apr612, 04:21 PM

Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
P: 9,162





#6
Apr612, 04:24 PM

Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
P: 9,162

You didn't say which direction the initial speed is in, but you have to assume a direction or there's not enough info. I hazarded that the original question specified tangential but that you had omitted that in stating it. 



#7
Apr612, 08:37 PM

P: 16




#8
Apr612, 09:29 PM

Mentor
P: 14,456

Welcome to the world of poorly written questions. This is the rest of your life. If only the real world was as clear as the ambiguity in this question.
The question as written does not have a unique answer. The question does provide enough information to determine the semi major axis of the orbit, but that is not what was asked for. You need to make some reasonable assumptions to be able to determine the apogee, and the obvious assumption is that the satellite is at perigee at the point in question. 



#9
Apr712, 05:08 AM

P: 16

1) i never asked to solve the question, my interest was in the approach ,which i thankfully got and was also the reason that i didn't bother about (2K^2) part. It was just an eg. to indicate what was my topic. 2) i was writing it from my memory and so i agree it was not properly put up by me. 3) though as dumb as i may seem to you , please explain me that what gives you this idea about semi major axis. let me point out that it has SPEED 1.2V where V is also a SPEED, it does not give any indication to me about its direction. Thanks for your rudeness and knowledge. 



#10
Apr712, 06:20 AM

Mentor
P: 14,456




Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
the eccentricity of binary stars' orbits  Astrophysics  7  
Gravitational Orbits  Introductory Physics Homework  9  
Gravitational Orbits  Introductory Physics Homework  1  
how is the eccentricity of planetary orbits related to the direction and movement of  General Astronomy  0  
Satellites, Orbits and Gravitational Energy  Introductory Physics Homework  2 