| New Reply |
Why physicists are shy? |
Share Thread |
| Apr9-12, 10:11 AM | #18 |
|
|
Why physicists are shy?
Anti social is a bad word, since they participate productively in society, they dont actively try to destroy it. Asocial would have fit the stereotype better.
|
| Apr9-12, 11:51 AM | #19 |
|
|
Because socializing in the sense* that you're speaking is at odds with the relatively easy to comprehend logics of physics/math/anything with definitive logic. The brain gets primed for that kind of reasoning.
Social science is anything but a science in the light of mathimatical sciences with experimental proofs. To say it different, social situations are difficult to "reason", in particular those interactions that dig deep into the sub-concious; like social interactions with the (attractive) opposite sex. That is why (imho) generally speaking people with strong logic/reasoning skills are not particularly skilled with social interaction, it's typicaly grey. That being said, I don't think this cooralates closely enough to physicists/scientists to make a general comment that they are shy. Note the difference between being shy, and being social retarded <-this probably preceeds shyness). I would say though, that people of an Asocial? personality would preffer fields such as math/sciences as opposed to say a hairdresser or comedian. *going to a bar alone and picking up chicks |
| Apr9-12, 11:54 AM | #20 |
|
|
(a joke)
|
| Apr9-12, 01:10 PM | #21 |
|
|
Im 16 years old and see myself becoming a theoretical physicist professor in the near future.
Anyway, I think that most physicist, especially the theoretical kind, seem shy is because they are always pondering the questions of the unsustainable. They think of things that the average person thinks about all the time but just in a more elaborative way. It's just what we do! |
| Apr9-12, 04:15 PM | #22 |
|
|
|
| Apr9-12, 04:19 PM | #23 |
|
|
|
| Apr9-12, 04:20 PM | #24 |
|
|
|
| Apr9-12, 04:32 PM | #25 |
|
|
|
| Apr9-12, 04:51 PM | #26 |
|
|
I've worked with very intelligent people my whole life, most of them engineers but many of them physicists. I've seen no evidence to support your claim that they are in any way socially inept. But as all other people, they prefer to spend their time around people similar to themselves who understand what they find interesting, so they tend to socialize with other very intelligent people and prefer to avoid other types. Perhaps you have observed these same people from the perspective of the other type.
|
| Apr9-12, 05:56 PM | #27 |
|
|
To ZapperZ's point, we're not the only ones clearly. It's all over media, contrary to ZapperZ's point, nerds & geeks are not imaginary or emulated from tv, it's the other way around...logically. From the inside looking out perhaps. |
| Apr9-12, 06:27 PM | #28 |
|
|
I'll go ahead and say it. Stupid people have an interest in pop culture (including "pop" social venues); smart people have no interest pop culture. Generally speaking
. Perhaps high IQ & being pop cultured is an inverse relationship. Generally speaking , |
| Apr9-12, 08:54 PM | #29 |
|
|
and yes, maybe I am in the other type, because I don't like to socialize only with very intelligent people. |
| Apr10-12, 12:37 AM | #30 |
|
|
I'm not good at talking to people but I think I'd be that way even if I wasn't studying physics.
|
| Apr10-12, 04:47 AM | #31 |
|
Mentor
Blog Entries: 28
|
Nerds and geeks, as you call it, are NOT exclusive only to physics. The media also depicts computer scientists, engineers, mathematicians, etc...etc. as those. But since when what the media depicts is accurate? And what does this have anything to do with anything in this thread? Back to the original post. If this is simply a guess and is not based on anything concrete, then aren't we discussing the properties of a unicorn? It doesn't exist, you say? Ah, but it is depicted in the movies and on TV! So we're not the only one! Zz. |
| Apr10-12, 08:04 AM | #32 |
|
|
Zapper of course we are speaking generally, so moving on from there you said
"For example, how many and how often do you encounter actual physicists, rather than just what you see depicted in the media?" I never said nerds & geeks are exclusive to physics. I'm a geek and work in accounting. You're suggesting what is depicted in the media is inaccurate, it's not (stay within context). Unless you are also suggesting that every scientist depicted on TV has poor social skills, which of course isn't the case. You brought media into this thread Zapper, I thought is was inaccurate the way you used it to suggest the OP would be wrong to base a stereo type from what they see on TV. Stereo types shown on TV generaly speaking are not inaccurate. In fact it's damn near proof, in particular if the stereo type depicted is popular like Big Bang Theory, The Simpsons. Note as well it's about hummor, so easy on offence. "If this is simply a guess and is not based on anything concrete, then aren't we discussing the properties of a unicorn? It doesn't exist, you say? Ah, but it is depicted in the movies and on TV! So we're not the only one!" Zapper your posts & reasoning are typically well above par. What on earth is with that comment above? Since unicorns are not real, and are shown on screens, all that is on screen is not real? I can't even derive a valid point from that comment above. |
| Apr12-12, 08:16 AM | #33 |
|
|
|
| Apr16-12, 07:08 AM | #34 |
|
|
|
| New Reply |
Similar discussions for: Why physicists are shy?
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| IQ of physicists | General Discussion | 14 | ||
| theory that most physicists believe that the decision | General Discussion | 8 | ||
| a little fun for the ADD physicists | General Physics | 1 | ||
| How do physicists do it? | Special & General Relativity | 4 | ||
| Best physicists | General Discussion | 13 | ||