Register to reply

Weird results when measuring water evaporation

by john321654
Tags: evaporation, measuring, results, water, weird
Share this thread:
Apr15-12, 11:45 PM
P: 1
I am doing a senior design project regarding water hydration and did some tests to get a general evaporation rate. I assumed that evaporation is proportional to the surface area of the water to air boundary so I thought that the water level of water in any constant cross section container should fall at the same rate. However, upon testing different sized plastic containers all next to each other, I found that the water level fell much faster in my 7 mm diameter plastic tube than in the 33 mm or 50 mm diameter tubes over several days. All the containers started filled to the brim and had a box covering them to stop light and any air currents.

My question is that why would the water level drop much faster in the smaller diameter tube?

Could it have something to do with the volume of water, the surface area of the container to the volume of water, the meniscus, or capillary action?

Here's a graph of the data.

Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on
New complex oxides could advance memory devices
Nature's designs inspire research into new light-based technologies
UCI team is first to capture motion of single molecule in real time
Apr16-12, 02:29 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 9,933
I can think of two possibilities.

1. As you say, the meniscus would make the surface area of the water in the narrow tube larger than merely the cross sectional area. That increase the ratio of surface area to water volume.

You could maybe test this by standing narrow tubes inside a wider one.

2. The narrow tube also has a larger surface area (around) in proportion to its volume. That makes for more heat flowing in through the sides of the tube per unit of water surface area.
Apr16-12, 09:21 AM
P: 1,408
The evaporated water has to diffuse away from the surface, or it will hinder further evaportation. This will go much easier from a smaller surface. Stopping air currents will make this much harder.
with a large container of water, you might fill the entire box with saturated water vapour, and evaporation will only depend on how fast the water vapour can diffuse out of the box through leaks/pores (or you opening it for measurements)
The vapour pressure of water is 2.3 kPa at 20C, so only 0.023 * 18/22.4 = 1.8 g/liter of water will make it 100% saturated, and the air might very well have been 50% saturated before you started, so you don't need all that much water to fill the entire box with saturated water vapour.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Measuring which path in Hardy's paradox, results Quantum Physics 1
Dissolving KNO3 in water; getting weird enthalpy results? Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 1
Wireless Signal Fluctuation. Weird Results. Computing & Technology 4
Weird Results from Neutrino Experiments High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 26
Force and Newton's 2nd, weird lab results Introductory Physics Homework 1