New Reply

Laws of logs question

 
Share Thread
Apr23-12, 08:25 PM   #1
 

Laws of logs question


I'm reading about how the chemistry kinetics equations are derived and heres something I don't get. How does this:

get turned into this:
[itex][A] = [A]_{0}*e^{-kt}[/itex]?
When I try to derive it, I first get this:
[itex]ln[A] - ln[A]_{0} = -kt[/itex].
Then I isolate ln[A] and get:
[itex]ln[A] = ln[A]_{0} - kt[/itex]
then I reverse the ln on both sides of the equation and get:
[itex][A] = [A]_{0} - e^{-kt}[/itex].
I don't understand how the two terms end up multiplied rather than subtracted.
PhysOrg.com mathematics news on PhysOrg.com

>> Pendulum swings back on 350-year-old mathematical mystery
>> Bayesian statistics theorem holds its own - but use with caution
>> Math technique de-clutters cancer-cell data, revealing tumor evolution, treatment leads
Apr23-12, 08:32 PM   #2
 
Quote by mycotheology View Post
I'm reading about how the chemistry kinetics equations are derived and heres something I don't get. How does this:

get turned into this:
[itex][A] = [A]_{0}*e^{-kt}[/itex]?
When I try to derive it, I first get this:
[itex]ln[A] - ln[A]_{0} = -kt[/itex].
Then I isolate ln[A] and get:
[itex]ln[A] = ln[A]_{0} - kt[/itex]
then I reverse the ln on both sides of the equation and get:
[itex][A] = [A]_{0} - e^{-kt}[/itex].

I don't understand how the two terms end up multiplied rather than subtracted.
The red part is the wrong part.
By reverse you use e as a index for exponentiation, so lets say :
ln a = ln b - c
e^(ln a) = e^(ln b - c)
u got your exponentialtion wrong.
Apr23-12, 09:30 PM   #3
 
Quote by mycotheology View Post
I'm reading about how the chemistry kinetics equations are derived and heres something I don't get. How does this:

get turned into this:
[itex][A] = [A]_{0}*e^{-kt}[/itex]?
When I try to derive it, I first get this:
[itex]ln[A] - ln[A]_{0} = -kt[/itex].
Then I isolate ln[A] and get:
[itex]ln[A] = ln[A]_{0} - kt[/itex]
then I reverse the ln on both sides of the equation and get:
[itex][A] = [A]_{0} - e^{-kt}[/itex].
I don't understand how the two terms end up multiplied rather than subtracted.
The easiest method to see this is to apply the exponential to each side.

##
\begin{eqnarray*}
\displaystyle ln\frac{[A]}{[A]_0} &=& -kt\\
\displaystyle e^{ln\frac{[A]}{[A]_0}}&=& e^{-kt}\\
\displaystyle \frac{[A]}{[A]_0} &=& e^{-kt}\\
\displaystyle [A] &=& [A]_0 e^{-kt}\\
\end{eqnarray*}
##
New Reply

Similar discussions for: Laws of logs question
Thread Forum Replies
Laws of logs Precalculus Mathematics Homework 4
Algebra: Laws of Logs General Math 9
calculus with logs and natural logs Calculus & Beyond Homework 4
logs question Introductory Physics Homework 10
Question on logs General Math 2