Amplitude reflection coefficient for high to low refractive index


by Eruditio
Tags: amplitude, electromagnetism, reflection, refractive index
Eruditio
Eruditio is offline
#1
Apr26-12, 06:57 AM
P: 4
For a wave travelling from a medium with refractive index n1 to n2 with n2 > n1, the amplitude reflection coefficient is given by:

r = (n2 - n1)/(n2 + n1)

Consider a beam of light passing through a single pane of glass. There is a reflection at the front surface of the pane, with the reflected amplitude obtainable through the above equation. If using the above equation for the second interface (the back of the pane, travelling from glass to air), r is negative but equal in magnitude to the first interface (travelling from air to glass). Does this make any difference? If calculating the percentage amplitude reduction, would one have to consider both interfaces, or just the first?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists consider implications of recent revelations about the universe's first light
Vacuum ultraviolet lamp of the future created in Japan
Grasp of SQUIDs dynamics facilitates eavesdropping
Born2bwire
Born2bwire is offline
#2
Apr26-12, 12:00 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Born2bwire's Avatar
P: 1,721
Yes, the reflection coefficient going from a high to low index of refraction is negative. The change in sign means that the reflected wave has a phase shift of 180 degrees.

As for the total transmission coefficient, it becomes more complicated because the total reflected and transmitted through a slab is going to be a result of multiple reflections within the slab. For example, you have a contribution from a beam that transmits through directly, t_1*t_2, then you have a contribution from the first order reflection off of the second interface, t_1*r_2*r_2*t_2, and so on and so on. This is a bit simplified because I haven't accounted for interference between these various orders due to the phase differences. It is possible to calculate the result. For example, the refletion coefficient for normal incidence is
[tex] \Gamma_{in} = \frac{\Gamma_{12}+\Gamma_{23}e^{i2k_2d}}{1+\Gamma_{12}\Gamma_{23}e^{i2k _2d}}[/tex]
Where
[tex]\Gamma_{ij} = \frac{\eta_j-\eta_i}{\eta_j+\eta_i}[/tex]
and k_2 is the wavenumber in the slab, d is the thickness of the slab, and \eta is the impedance of the medium which is [itex]\sqrt{\frac{\mu}{\epsilon}}[/itex] while the index of refraction is [itex]\sqrt{\mu_r\epsilon_r}[/itex]. If the permeability of the slab case is homogeneous then we can see that \Gamma_{ij} gives us the same result if we use the equation I gave using wave impedance or the equation using index of refraction.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Reflection of light with known refractive index. Advanced Physics Homework 14
Reflection loss and refractive index Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 1
refractive index Classical Physics 2
Refractive index of gold? (& negative refractive index, + surface plasmon resonance?) Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 3
At what angle of incidence is amplitude coefficient of reflection parallel to the inc Introductory Physics Homework 1