System of green functions in solid state physics


by siver
Tags: functions, green, physics, solid, state
siver
siver is offline
#1
Apr29-12, 11:59 AM
P: 3
Assume we have a solid state hamiltonian, which is ellectrons plus nuclei plus all possible interactions:
H = [itex]T_{el}[/itex] + [itex]V_{el-el}[/itex] + [itex]T_{n}[/itex] + [itex]V_{n-n}[/itex] + [itex]V_{n-el}[/itex]
Is it wrong to write down a self-consistent system of Green functions for electrons and phonons?
[itex]G_{el}[/itex]=g + gS[itex]G_{el}[/itex]
[itex]G_{ph}[/itex]=g + gS[itex]G_{ph}[/itex]
S operator does the interraction thing.
Looks fair to me, but I've never seen any articles doing this way.
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Researchers develop scalable methods for manufacturing metamaterials
Researchers find tin selenide shows promise for efficiently converting waste heat into electrical energy
After 13 years, progress in pitch-drop experiment (w/ video)
sam_bell
sam_bell is offline
#2
Apr29-12, 05:33 PM
P: 67
If by little 'g' you mean free particle propagator, then it's not wrong --for the electrons. The operator 's' is then the self-energy operator. You can look it up. It's not as obvious to me what little 'g' is for phonons. The typical derivation of phonons has already taken into account effects of electrical interactions in the "spring force" between ions. Maybe you could take the 's' in the case of phonons to represent all the deviations from this ideal case.

p.s. you need to use a different symbol 'g' for electrons and phonons, or you'll get confused.
siver
siver is offline
#3
Apr30-12, 02:49 PM
P: 3
Thanks for reply!

Sure thing g's (free particle propagators) are different for different particle types.
I'm worried if this "system" of two equations eve exist. Maybe they're jsut independent equations with totally diferent self-patrs for each quasiparticle. And it's pointless to solve them as a system.

sam_bell
sam_bell is offline
#4
Apr30-12, 03:39 PM
P: 67

System of green functions in solid state physics


It's best to use the Born-Oppenheimer approximation. In other words, first consider the locations of the nuclei fixed, and then solve the corresponding electronic problem. This will give you an electronic self-energy that is dependent on the nuclear coordinates. It will also define an effective potential for the nuclear problem according to V(R1, ..., RN) = (total ground state energy when nuclei at coordinates R1, ..., RN). This in turn defines a new problem for the nuclear coordinates. This should be solved in two stages. First stage is harmonic approximation (giving you phonons and little 'g'), and second stage is finding phonon self-energy resulting from anharmonic deviations. Not taking advantage of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation is too ambitious. Only if it fails should you consider chucking it.
siver
siver is offline
#5
May1-12, 05:56 AM
P: 3
To avoid BO approx is the main perpose, my system likes to dance. =)
Thanks alot.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
solid state physics: phonon density of state Advanced Physics Homework 0
Impurity State Green's functions Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 4
Should I take Solid State Physics? Academic Guidance 16
solid state physics Advanced Physics Homework 1
Solid State Physics Introductory Physics Homework 4