| New Reply |
Is this a valid argument about box topology? |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| May2-12, 12:51 PM | #1 |
|
|
Is this a valid argument about box topology?
Given the following sequence in the product space R^ω, such that the coordinates of x_n are 1/n,
x1 = {1, 1, 1, ...} x2 = {1/2, 1/2, 1/2, ...} x3 = {1/3, 1/3, 1/3, ...} ... the basis in the box topology can be written as ∏(-1/n, 1/n). However, as n becomes infinitely large, the basis converges to ∏(0, 0), which is a single set and not open. Therefore the sequence is not convergent in box topology. Since there exists a basis that converges to ∏(x, x), for any element x of R^ω, a sequence in box topology does not converge to any element in R^ω. |
| May2-12, 04:20 PM | #2 |
|
Recognitions:
|
What kind of convergence are you talking about? Are you talking about a sequence of sets or a sequence of points? Under the usual definition of convergence, a sequence of points in a toplogical space that converges will converge to a point. There is no requirement that it converge to an open set. |
| May2-12, 05:44 PM | #3 |
|
|
I don't know the right terminology. x_n represents a point in R^ω that has infinite number of coordinates. I want to use the sequence that if each of the coordinate converges as n grows large, x_n converges to a point.
I want to show the difference between product topology and box topology using the sequence x_n = {1/n, 1/, 1/n, ..., 1/n, ... }. A textbook argument, if I read correctly, says that because 1/n eventually goes to 0, there is no open set in the box topology that contains (-δ, δ) in R, hence no function converges. Am I on the right track? |
| May2-12, 09:28 PM | #4 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Is this a valid argument about box topology?
To get a clear answer, you're going to have state a clear question. You mention a sequence of points and then you talk about a function converging without explaining what function you mean.
If there is a textbook argument, then quote the argument. Quote it, don't just give a mangled summary. (Perhaps the discipline of copying it will make it clearer to you.) |
| May2-12, 09:50 PM | #5 |
|
|
Thanks but no thank you. You are not being helpful at all.
|
| May2-12, 10:50 PM | #6 |
|
|
|
| New Reply |
| Tags |
| box topology, converge, sequence, topology |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Is this a valid argument about box topology?
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Sentential Logic: Is the argument valid? | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 4 | ||
| Tell if this Argument is valid (Propositional Logic)? | Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics | 1 | ||
| Prove the argument form valid | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 4 | ||
| valid argument ? | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 2 | ||
| Valid Units of Measure for Trig Argument | Introductory Physics Homework | 5 | ||