|May6-12, 01:49 PM||#1|
J.J. Thomson's cathode ray experiment
In Rohlf's Modern Physics textbook it reads: "The value of q/m for the electron determined by Thomson wan substantially smaller than the values of q/m determined by electrolysis, that is, q/m for the electron is much smaller than for ionized atoms. There were two extreme possibilities: (1) The electron charge is much smaller than the charge of an ionized atom, or (2) the electron mass is much smaller than the mass of an ionized atom (or both!) " (Rohlf 12).
Of course we know the mass to be much smaller but is the book description correct? It seems to me that m/q should be smaller for electrons, not q/m, because either the mass is smaller or the charge is larger. Could someone shed light on this?
physics news on PhysOrg.com
>> Promising doped zirconia
>> New X-ray method shows how frog embryos could help thwart disease
>> Bringing life into focus
|May6-12, 06:27 PM||#2|
Looks like Rohlf has it backwards - good catch.
The confusion may arise because some refer to m/q and some to q/m.
|May6-12, 08:27 PM||#3|
Okay thanks. It was bugging me.
|Similar Threads for: J.J. Thomson's cathode ray experiment|
|J.J. Thomson's Experiment, Help!||Calculus & Beyond Homework||2|
|J.J. Thomson's m/e Experiment, Help!||Calculus & Beyond Homework||2|
|Why J.J Thomson use gold in his experiment for atomic model?||High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics||10|
|In an experiment similar to Thomson's...||Introductory Physics Homework||0|
|Deflection and Magnetic Fields in Thomson's Experiment||Advanced Physics Homework||0|