| New Reply |
Rotation relative velocity? |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Jul1-12, 01:28 AM | #1 |
|
|
Rotation relative velocity?
A body is rolling without slipping. Let P be topmost point at an instant and Q bottom-most point at that instant..Is it true that Q remains stationary with respect to P all the time?
What i thought was the purely mathematical thing. P will have velocity 2v to right and Q will have 0 velocity. Velcoity of Q with respect to P comes out to be -2v. BUt thinking about it, P is always at a distance of 2r from Q. So i am confused as to what should be answer? |
| Jul1-12, 02:32 AM | #2 |
|
|
hi kalpeshk2011!
![]() if the question was originally written in english, it was quite badly written ![]() the way i read it is that P and Q are particular points which are identified by their position at, say 2 o'clock since at 2.05 they'll both be in completely different positions, no they're not relatively stationary (thoguh of course they do remain at the same distance from each other) but i expect the question is meant to mean "Let P be the topmost point at every instant and Q the bottom-most point at every instant" |
| Jul1-12, 03:11 AM | #3 |
|
Recognitions:
|
I assume this is on a level surface. Yes, P will still be 2r from Q, but velocity is a vector. Instantaneously, Q will be stationary while P will move at right angles to the line joining PQ, so the distance between them won't change. A little later, P will still be moving at right angles to the line joining it to the new lowest point, Q', but tending to move away from the new position of Q. But that is counteracted by the way Q is now moving, so the distance PQ stays fixed.
|
| Jul1-12, 06:53 AM | #4 |
|
|
Rotation relative velocity?
P is a point which is initially at the top. Similarly Q is initially at the bottom..YOu didnt answer my question. Is Q always stationary with respect to P?
|
| Jul1-12, 07:00 AM | #5 |
|
|
|
| Jul1-12, 07:02 AM | #6 |
|
|
ok thank you very much :)
|
| Jul1-12, 09:12 AM | #7 |
|
|
I don't know which course this is meant for, but keep in mind that in car tire terminology, if it's not "slipping", then it will never roll
There is actually a magnitude called "slip", which has to do with the deformation of the tire. If slip=0, it will stay in place until the end of time.
|
| Jul1-12, 04:44 PM | #8 |
|
|
![]() (the phrase "rolling without slipping" is extremely common in physics exam questions, and indeed occurred at the start of this question) |
| Jul2-12, 08:37 AM | #9 |
|
|
That's why I mentioned it, in case that it's not the typical physics course
|
| Jul2-12, 09:15 AM | #10 |
|
|
1. Q remains stationary relative to P all the time in the sense that their distance doesn't change; thus, Q and P are stationary with respect to a co-moving rotating reference system. Another, well known example is that of "geostationary" satellites. 2. Q is not stationary relative to P in the sense that Q is moving relative to P with respect to any inertial reference system - which is what we commonly use for descriptions of physics. Harald |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Rotation relative velocity?
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Finding the 3 Rotation Angles of an Object relative to another point. | General Math | 0 | ||
| Finding rafts velocity relative to the water using 2 masses and one velocity | Introductory Physics Homework | 2 | ||
| Relative velocity=relative momentum? | Special & General Relativity | 1 | ||
| Rotation & Relative Motion Problem | Advanced Physics Homework | 0 | ||
| Relative Velocity + rotation | Introductory Physics Homework | 0 | ||