| New Reply |
SR for cl. rel. field theories. |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Jul18-12, 03:42 AM | #1 |
|
|
SR for cl. rel. field theories.
I read basic stuff about relativity (time dilitation etc.) in a HS textbook.
I want to do some relativistic dynamics and go up to Einsteins field equations (GR). For GR I will definitely need tensor analysis. However, what is the math involved in the SR that I need to get to classic relativistic field theories (Electromagnetic),which I want to do before doing GR? |
| Jul19-12, 07:57 AM | #2 |
|
|
For the second question, I think you refer to Classical Electrodynamics? For it you need vector calculus, and to know something about tensor if you use covariant formalism. Is this what you were asking? |
| Jul19-12, 08:48 AM | #3 |
|
|
As far as my understanding goes, maxwells basic equations describe the EM field without relativistic effects (I have done them already, as well es basic vec. calc. (div. grad. rot.)). I just had a look at some lecture notes from the internet and it had a lot of tensors for relativistic maxwelltheory. not really following it (because I know few about tensors in relativity) i saw langrange densities coming up while going through it.
I know the how to derive lagrange densities in mechanics (they can be nonrelativistic) and thought, there was a way to have maxwell field theory in lagrangian form, but this probably corresponds to relativistic forms only. (is this correct?) should I start doing tensors and relativity first to get to relativistic maxwelltheory? |
| Jul19-12, 09:48 AM | #4 |
|
Recognitions:
|
SR for cl. rel. field theories.Of course one can take a non-rel. limit, giving "Galilean Maxwell theories", but that's a different cookie. |
| Jul19-12, 10:17 AM | #5 |
|
|
Maybe it was wrong, that with relativistic I referred to time dilatation and doing Lorentztransformations. |
| Jul20-12, 02:51 AM | #6 |
|
|
What are you looking for, I think it is electrodynamics. You can study the motion of particles in electromagnetic field, and for this you need special relativity and tensors. |
| Jul20-12, 03:01 AM | #7 |
|
|
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0311011/
I've just found this notes, try to look at them, even if they are more mathematic than physics. The standard reference for the subject is a book called Classical Electrodynamics by Jackson. |
| Jul20-12, 06:06 AM | #8 |
|
|
So is this also what the Langrangians are for? |
| Jul20-12, 08:30 AM | #9 |
|
|
|
| Jul20-12, 01:52 PM | #10 |
|
|
|
| New Reply |
| Tags |
| field theory, math relativity |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: SR for cl. rel. field theories.
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| renormalizable quantum field theories | Quantum Physics | 83 | ||
| Toy field theories | High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics | 3 | ||
| Hidden Metrics, Field Divergences & Finite Quantum Field Theories | General Physics | 1 | ||
| S-matrix in conformal field theories | General Physics | 0 | ||
| Interacting field theories from free ones? | General Physics | 1 | ||