| New Reply |
Finding Inverse from Known Linear System |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Aug1-12, 02:16 PM | #1 |
|
|
Finding Inverse from Known Linear System
Hello All:
Suppose I have a completely known linear system: A*x=b. I know the matrix A, and an x and the associated RHS vector b (and it is non-trivial). Is there some tricky way to directly determine the inverse of A without performing an inversion by typical means (Gauss elimination, LU, etc) ? Thanks much. |
| PhysOrg.com |
science news on PhysOrg.com >> Hong Kong launches first electric taxis >> Morocco to harness the wind in energy hunt >> Galaxy's Ring of Fire |
| Aug1-12, 02:21 PM | #2 |
|
|
You could use Cramer's rule.
|
| Aug1-12, 02:36 PM | #3 |
|
|
True. But my situation is that it is a large system. To use Cramer's rule would be expensive. I was wondering if because I have a known transformation (a known X and its corresponding B vector), that there may be something else that could be done.
For example, if I write x = A^-1 * b Then perform a dyadic product with a known vector, d, (of my choosing): xd = A^-1 * bd Then: (xd)((bd)^-1) = A^-1 Something like this. However I know that you can't take an inverse of a dyad. This was my idea, but I just haven't used tensors in a long while and don't even know if what I am asking is possible. Thanks |
| Aug1-12, 03:16 PM | #4 |
|
|
Finding Inverse from Known Linear System
hey Blue, try using the LaTeX feature here. it helps you express your mathematical thinking and it helps us read what you express accurately.
do you simply want to solve for [itex] \mathbf{x} [/itex]? or do you want [itex] \mathbf{A}^{-1} [/itex]? |
| Aug1-12, 03:35 PM | #5 |
|
|
Sorry. Yes I want [itex]\mathbf{A}^{-1}[/itex] (actually, particular entries in [itex]\mathbf{A}^{-1}[/itex]) . I have A and an x,b pair. My math from earlier (which I know you can't do unless the dyad is complete... but it was my original thinking):
[itex]\mathbf{x}[/itex] = [itex]\mathbf{A}^{-1}[/itex][itex]\mathbf{b}[/itex] Make dyadic product with clever vector [itex]\mathbf{d}[/itex]: [itex]\mathbf{xd}[/itex] = [itex]\mathbf{A}^{-1}[/itex][itex]\mathbf{bd}[/itex] then, [itex]\mathbf{(xd)}[/itex][itex]\mathbf{(bd)}^{-1}[/itex] = [itex]\mathbf{A}^{-1}[/itex] My thought was that [itex]\mathbf{d}[/itex] could be chosen so that [itex]\mathbf{(bd)}^{-1}[/itex] might be simple. Again the tensor math here is not correct, I just wanted to throw out my thought. Thanks. |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Finding Inverse from Known Linear System
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| finding inverse of linear mapping | Differential Geometry | 3 | ||
| Finding State Matrix from given states in an autonomous Linear Dynamical System | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 0 | ||
| system of linear equations (Finding Real numbers in a Unique Solution!) | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 6 | ||
| Linear algebra: Finding a linear system with a subspace as solution set | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 1 | ||
| finding inverse of non-linear transformation | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 3 | ||