New Reply

General question about sets

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Jul30-12, 08:13 AM   #1
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member

General question about sets


SETS DEFINED BY SPECIFICATION: Given a set X and a sentence P(x) that is either true or false whenever x is any particular element of X, there is a set whose elements are precisely those x ∈ X for which P(x) is true, denoted by {x ∈ X : P(x)}.
Does this mean that whenever the function P(x) is true, then x is an element of X, and when P(x) is false, then x is not an element of X?

I'm confused because the wording says that "...a sentence P(x) that is either true or false whenever x is any particular element of X..." which leads me to believe that whether P(x) is either true or false, then it is still an element of set X.

Or is it saying that there is a set within X in which P(x) is true, and there is also another set within X in which P(x) is false?
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Galaxies fed by funnels of fuel
>> The better to see you with: Scientists build record-setting metamaterial flat lens
>> Google eyes emerging markets networks
Jul30-12, 09:38 AM   #2
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Hmm, no, it's neither of these.

The set [itex]\{x\in X~\vert~P(x)\}[/itex] are all the elements of X which satisfy P. So, in particular, we want all elements to lie in X.

Maybe some examples may help you to see the concept:
  • [itex]A=\{x\in \mathbb{N}~\vert~x~\text{is even}\}[/itex]
    This means that we take all the elements of [itex]\mathbb{Z}[/itex] which are even. So the elements of our set A are precisely 0,2,4,6,8,10,12,...
  • [itex]B=\{x\in \mathbb{Z}~\vert~x>0\}[/itex]
    This is the set of all positive integers. The set consists out of 1,2,3,4,...
    Note that x=1/2 also satisfies x>0. But 1/2 does not belong to B because it doesn't satisfy [itex]x\in \mathbb{Z}[/itex].
  • [itex]C=\{x\in \mathbb{Q}~\vert~2x+2=0\}[/itex]
    This is the set of all rational numbers x such that 2x+2=0. The only number satisfying that is of course -1. And this number is in [itex]\mathbb{Q}[/itex], so it belongs to C.

Does this clear up some things?
Jul30-12, 09:43 AM   #3
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
In those 3 examples, would A be considered a proper subset of N, B a proper subset of Z, and C a proper subset of Q?
Jul30-12, 09:50 AM   #4
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus

General question about sets


Quote by PhizKid View Post
In those 3 examples, would A be considered a proper subset of N, B a proper subset of Z, and C a proper subset of Q?
Yes. These are all proper subsets.

Another example would be

[tex]D=\{x\in \mathbb{N}~\vert~x\geq 0\}[/tex]

So this set consists of all elements in [itex]\mathbb{N}[/itex] which are larger than 0. Clearly, this is the entire set. So D is not a proper subset in this case.
Aug2-12, 04:57 PM   #5
 
x has to be in the universe of discourse X and pass the truth condition x is an element of P(x).
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: General question about sets
Thread Forum Replies
3 questions concerning open and closed sets for sets having to do with sequence space Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
Question on sets Calculus & Beyond Homework 12
trouble with constructing intersection of sets for de morgans, to get a union of sets Calculus & Beyond Homework 4
Question about Sets Calculus & Beyond Homework 6
question about sets. Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 4