New Reply

Intuition behind Integration by parts

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Aug28-12, 05:00 PM   #1
 

Intuition behind Integration by parts


I have some problems understanding the intuition behind the integration by parts technique. I don't quite see why you solve for [itex]\int u(x)v\prime (x)[/itex], instead of one of the other parts, what makes it easier to solve for that particular term?

And in general when working with integration techniques, does an expression like du have any mathematical meaning by itself or are those substitutions just used to make integration easier?
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Galaxies fed by funnels of fuel
>> The better to see you with: Scientists build record-setting metamaterial flat lens
>> Google eyes emerging markets networks
Aug28-12, 05:46 PM   #2
 
Mentor
Quote by Polymath89 View Post
I have some problems understanding the intuition behind the integration by parts technique. I don't quite see why you solve for [itex]\int u(x)v\prime (x)[/itex], instead of one of the other parts, what makes it easier to solve for that particular term?
Integration by parts is essentially the integral counterpart of the product rule in differentiation.

If f(x) = u(x) * v(x), then f'(x) = u(x) * v'(x) + u'(x) * v(x)

If we integrate the equation above, we get
∫f'(x)dx = ∫(u(x) * v'(x) + u'(x) * v(x))dx
= ∫u(x) * v'(x) dx + ∫u'(x) * v(x)dx

Simplifying a bit, we get
f(x) = ∫u(x) * v'(x) dx + ∫u'(x) * v(x)dx

or
∫u(x) * v'(x) dx = f(x) - ∫u'(x) * v(x)dx = u(x)*v(x) - ∫u'(x) * v(x)dx

Notice that I solved for ∫u(x) * v'(x) dx. I could just as easily have solved for the other integral. So in answer to your question, it doesn't make any difference. The only criterion is that ∫u'(x) * v(x)dx should be easier to work with than the other integral.


Quote by Polymath89 View Post
And in general when working with integration techniques, does an expression like du have any mathematical meaning by itself or are those substitutions just used to make integration easier?
Yes, it has meaning. When you use a substitution, say u = 3x2, then du is the differential of u. In this case, du = d/dx(3x2) * dx = 6x*dx.
Aug28-12, 06:21 PM   #3
 
In my experience, choose to be u the function with the simplest derivative. If you can choose a function like "2x" - make it u because when taking the integral of vdu, you want du to contribute little complexity to the integral.

As for your comment about the mathematical meaning of du, its understandable to have the feeling that it has no mathematical meaning because most people don't see the meaning until they are done learning calculus and are instead applying it.

It is a differential element of u. What does that mean? I think of it as "a piece of u so small that it can barely be said to exist at all."

Look at it this way - the derivative notation, dy/dx, is a slope. The reason why we are saying "differential element of y over a differential element of x" is because even though the rate of change of a function may not be constant, the differential elements are so small that we can take the rate of change "over the course of a differential element" as being constant because there is no room for variation. That's why for a function like x^2 it makes sense to say (dy/dx) = 6 at some point even though the rate of change of the function is continuously changing.
Aug29-12, 01:45 PM   #4
 

Intuition behind Integration by parts


Thats was pretty helpful, thanks a lot guys.
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Intuition behind Integration by parts
Thread Forum Replies
Integration - u substitution problem (Integration by parts?) Calculus & Beyond Homework 7
Integration by parts, help me understand why the integration limits changed. Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
Integration problems. (Integration by parts) Calculus & Beyond Homework 5
Help with integration (1) involving integration by parts...etc Calculus & Beyond Homework 5
integration by parts Calculus & Beyond Homework 31