How Do Dimensions Align in Gravitoelectromagnetic Force Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter help1please
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the gravitoelectromagnetic force equations, specifically comparing them to the conventional Lorentz force equation. Participants are examining the dimensional consistency of these equations and the implications of substituting mass for charge.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the dimensional correctness of the gravitoelectromagnetic force equation in relation to the Lorentz force equation. There is an exploration of the meanings and units of the symbols involved, particularly focusing on the term E_g.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants clarifying terms and units. Some have pointed out the need to carefully consider the definitions and implications of the symbols used in the equations, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

There is a reference to an external wiki page that contains the equations, which may impose constraints on the discussion due to its reliance on that source for definitions and explanations.

help1please
Messages
167
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There are two force equations in this wiki page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitoelectromagnetism

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The conventional Lorentz force is

[tex]F = q(E + v \times B)[/tex]

It says that the gravielectromagnetic force equation:

[tex]F = m(E_g + v \times B_g)[/tex]

Is it's gravitational analogue. Yet, the only difference between the equations is that mass and charge have been exchanged.

How can the dimensions be right in the second equation?


Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
help1please said:
Yet, the only difference between the equations is that mass and charge have been exchanged.

No, that's not the only difference. The other symbols have changed, too. What are their units?
 
what is [tex]E_g[/tex]?

I take it then, it's not simply the electric field?
 
It's not. The article explains that down to the units involved. Give it another try, just do it carefully :)
 
Ah it says it is the gravielectric field even. Sorry about that. So what is E_g written out?
 
As the article says, it's just the static gravitational field, acceleration due to static gravity (i.e., independent of any accelerated motion).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K