| New Reply |
Here we go with cellphone tumors again |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Sep5-12, 08:53 PM | #1 |
|
|
Here we go with cellphone tumors again
Does a medical or statistics professional who understands all this jargon want to lay it out for me?
|
| Sep5-12, 09:15 PM | #2 |
|
|
Also, I wonder if this study did anything significantly different than the numerous studies it contradicts?
|
| Sep6-12, 06:38 AM | #3 |
|
|
The link wasn't usable for me. However, given the large general population use of wireless devices, I'm not sure how they identify cell phone induced tumor vs. any other. Here's another link to comparable article that seems consistent with yours http://www.cancermonthly.com/blog/20...ellphones.html I assume since most people are right handed, these are right side tumors?
Here's another article that researches and discusses glioma location and possible reasons http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1907421/ |
| Sep7-12, 09:13 PM | #4 |
|
|
Here we go with cellphone tumors againBy the way the same people who believe in the cell phone cancer thing also believe wireless modems |
| Sep7-12, 09:19 PM | #5 |
|
|
|
| Sep8-12, 10:37 PM | #6 |
|
Recognitions:
|
The article you posted is the latest in a line: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22939605
A possible interpretation is given by http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22403263 "Based on relative risks of glioma by tumour latency and cumulative hours of phone use in the Swedish study, predicted rates should have been at least 40% higher than observed rates in 2008. However, predicted glioma rates based on the small proportion of highly exposed people in the Interphone study could be consistent with the observed data." The full text of the latter article seems to be free. |
| Sep10-12, 07:32 AM | #7 |
|
|
That brings to mind a question. My kids both have "cell phones", and I say "cell phones" because they use them 95% of the time to "text" and when they are actually using a phone as a phone, it's on speaker. I wonder if the studies factor in cell phone use that is texting or on speaker (not up to the ear), e.g. my kids? |
| Sep10-12, 09:30 AM | #8 |
|
Mentor
Blog Entries: 1
|
|
| Sep10-12, 01:24 PM | #9 |
|
|
|
| Sep10-12, 01:41 PM | #10 |
|
|
|
| Sep11-12, 01:54 PM | #11 |
|
|
I try to use the speakerphone whenever a call will last more than a minute or two.
|
| Sep11-12, 04:33 PM | #12 |
|
|
but what difference does it make if your phone touches you face vs 1 feet away from you. The frequency of the wave doesnt change, the intensity does. But classically all the research in terms radiation and cancer have been done with varying frequencies of the waves. Either the wave penetrates you skin and skull and hits the brain or it doesnt. A change in distance cant make that much of difference.
|
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Here we go with cellphone tumors again
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Why are Metastasis & tumors fatal? | Biology | 3 | ||
| Do tumors have functioning mitochondria? | Biology | 1 | ||
| Matlab Code to Detect Tumors | Engineering Systems & Design | 1 | ||
| Electrochemical treatment of tumors | Materials & Chemical Engineering | 0 | ||
| What is the difference between cancerous tumors and benign ones? | Biology | 3 | ||