Register to reply 
Which electrical engineering subdiscipline uses the most math? 
Share this thread: 
#1
Nov1312, 02:11 AM

P: 59

Between control theory, photonics/optoelectronics/semiconductor devices, electromagnetics (antennas or other application), which of these fields has the potential to expose me to the most mathematics in graduate school?



#2
Nov1312, 09:08 AM

P: 136

It sounds to me like you would prefer becoming a mathematician than an EE.
Most of which you mentioned are the most physics based EE courses so they will have a bit more (and different) maths than other specialties digital logic, processors, etc. [maa on undergrad EE] You could ask your professors for specifics. But why more math? As an EE, you should choose what interests you most (which may very well be the one(s) with the most math). [Note: I'm only a freshman CompEE major but the mathematics you will roughly use is given by MAA EE chapter (and to me by my EE orientation)] 


#3
Nov1312, 09:18 AM

P: 609

electromagnetics and semi/super conductor physics.
some aspects of electronics (filters) are pretty mathy too. 


#4
Nov1312, 10:19 AM

P: 661

Which electrical engineering subdiscipline uses the most math?
This thread might have some good advice for you:
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=332777 I know it's not on your list but I currently have a professor that is in communication theory that talked up DSP to us earlier this semester so I looked up some of his work. His papers and others I've seen within DSP/communications read like a pure math paper; definition, theorem, proof, repeat. By the way, I'm only a junior in EE right now. I would like to hear what people have to say about control theory or other branches that use a lot of math. 


#5
Nov1312, 05:01 PM

P: 59

Thanks a lot for the responses, guys. The subdisciplines I mentioned are the main ones I am considering.
Klungo, I really like math and physics, but I also want to directly contribute to new technology. I also think an engineering graduate degree might be more marketable than physics/math grad degrees for industry/government research jobs. Also, while I like both, if I had to pick between learning more math and learning more physics, I'd pick math. Clope023, can you please give specific examples? The two courses I took in semiconductor electronics were not highly mathematical. They mostly consisted of "plugandchug" problems and applying physics "rules of thumb" (quantum mech. Was not a prerequisite). As for Electromagnetics, it involves vector calculus and linear PDEs, but does it progress beyond that math wise? For example, nonlinear control theory makes use of Lie groups and differential geometry, from what I understand which seems much more advanced. Also, I don't know a lot about superconductors which you mentioned. DrummingAtom, thanks a lot for the thread link. It was reassuring to see DSP, control theory, and communications listed because that was what I thought. Control just sounds the most interesting out of those to me though. Thanks again everyone, and I'd love to hear any more advice. 


#6
Nov1312, 06:56 PM

P: 59

By the way guys, I forgot to mention that I am a senior in EE. I've also taken a decent amount of math so far (calc 14, elementary ODEs, discrete math, linear algebra, elementary PDEs, vector analysis  will be taking complex variables and maybe advanced diff. eq.s in the spring).
I'm currently working on applying for grad schools/fellowships right now. My academic advisor is sort of a "theoretical" control theory researcher. He has said that if I choose control theory, he would be more than willing to help me with choosing schools and has even said he would email professors at other schools to "vouch" for me. I'm just trying to make a decision soon with deadlines coming up. 


#7
Nov1312, 11:32 PM

P: 609




#8
Nov1312, 11:59 PM

P: 59

If I just went to graduate school for physics, I would learn a lot of physics (good!) and a lot of abstract math from the advanced courses like G.R., Q.E.D., etc. (also good!). But I want to do engineering for a few reasons. Within electrical engineering, I could do engineering physics (for example, MIT offers this as an area within EE: Area IV I believe). But the problem is that (I think) the physics used in electrical engineering physics is mainly Q.M. and electromagnetics. I like these topics, but I don't see the math progressing to the level of the math in G.R. But, my advisor (controls guy) has given me examples about how a lot of the math in advanced physics also shows up in control theory. For example, differential geometry (used in G.R.) is used in nonlinear control. So I kind of view my choice as one between EE + more math(controls) or EE + more physics(but not more math). So I think I should choose controls in lieu of photonics or electromagnetics if learning math is more important to me than learning physics. Edit: Also, my advisor claims that if I "want to do theoretical controls, I can go as far with math as I want" 


#9
Nov1412, 12:29 AM

P: 2,251




#10
Nov1412, 12:30 AM

P: 746

Don't you think it would be wise to pick whatever area of research you enjoy the most, rather than picking out the one with the most math? The difference in the amount of math probably isn't substantial.
If you really love doing hard math, then just do math. 


#11
Nov1412, 01:00 AM

P: 59

Edit: the areas I listed in the OP were the ones I was considering; they were not intended as a comprehensive list of EE disciplines 


#12
Nov1412, 01:03 AM

P: 59

I like technology, electricity, and "physicsy" kinds of things. But I also like math and wouldn't mind learning as much math as possible while pursuing my other interests 


#13
Nov1412, 09:57 AM

P: 609




#14
Nov1412, 10:27 AM

P: 59




#15
Nov1512, 12:04 AM

P: 1,197

My dad does control theory and says the top people in the field are just like mathematicians. 


#16
Nov1512, 01:45 AM

P: 59

Awesome to hear about your dad, that's reassuring. 


#17
Nov1512, 02:40 AM

P: 661

By the way, does anyone know of branches in EE that get into the theoretical stuff from linear algebra? Like vector spaces, inner products, orthogonality, etc. 


#18
Nov1512, 03:12 AM

P: 59

However, modern control theory is formulated in the time domain. The "state" of dynamical systems are represented as a vector in a vector space. Instead of the transfer function model of classical control theory, dynamical systems are represented in "state space" using matrix equations. Systems are analyzed using linear algebra techniques for instance, the location of eigenvalues of a certain system matrix in the complex plane determine the stability of the system. Another example of linear algebra computations used is using change of basis transformations to represent a system with a different set of dynamical variables as the basis vectors. Some intro university classes focus on classical control theory, but mine has been using both approaches. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
More math for electrical engineering student  Academic Guidance  3  
Graduate School Electrical Engineering with a BS in Math  Academic Guidance  4  
Reviewing math for electrical engineering classes  Academic Guidance  1  
Math courses recommended for electrical engineering major?  Academic Guidance  7  
Does a MATH Bachelor's prepare you for an Electrical Engineering Master's?  Academic Guidance  9 