- #1
randomafk
- 23
- 0
So, when dealing with the Hydrogen molecule (H2) we know each electron is antisymmetric since they're fermions
i.e. [itex]\Psi_\_ = 1/\sqrt(2) * (\Psi_a(r1) * \Psi_b(r2) - \Psi_b(r1) * \Psi_a(r2))[/itex]
and then similarly for the spinor such that the total state, [itex]\Psi\chi[/itex] is antisymmetric
When you deal with atoms, like helim, we can approximate the state of the system as the product of hydrogen wave ([itex]\Psi = \Psi_a *\Psi_b[/itex]). But in doing so, aren't we assuming the electrons are distinct? Why not with that formula for [itex]\Psi_\_[/itex]
i.e. [itex]\Psi_\_ = 1/\sqrt(2) * (\Psi_a(r1) * \Psi_b(r2) - \Psi_b(r1) * \Psi_a(r2))[/itex]
and then similarly for the spinor such that the total state, [itex]\Psi\chi[/itex] is antisymmetric
When you deal with atoms, like helim, we can approximate the state of the system as the product of hydrogen wave ([itex]\Psi = \Psi_a *\Psi_b[/itex]). But in doing so, aren't we assuming the electrons are distinct? Why not with that formula for [itex]\Psi_\_[/itex]