help with solution of legendre's diffrential equation.


by A Dhingra
Tags: diffrential, equation, legendre, solution
A Dhingra
A Dhingra is offline
#1
Nov19-12, 08:11 AM
P: 196
hi.

Is there something wrong in using the Frobenius method for regular singular point while solving Legendre's differential equation (expanding about x=0)?
Though the solution of Legendre Differential Equation here- http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Legendr...lEquation.html
uses the other form. But my book uses the Frobenius method for regular singular point..

( Forbenius method- http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FrobeniusMethod.html )
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Lemurs match scent of a friend to sound of her voice
Repeated self-healing now possible in composite materials
'Heartbleed' fix may slow Web performance
HallsofIvy
HallsofIvy is offline
#2
Nov19-12, 03:10 PM
Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 38,877
No, there is nothing at all wrong with that. But there are many different ways of solving the same differential equation.
A Dhingra
A Dhingra is offline
#3
Nov19-12, 08:20 PM
P: 196
Okay...thanks.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Solution to Legendre equation in trig form Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Can't figure out how to solve a diffrential equation Differential Equations 4
Diffrential equation subject qs Differential Equations 2
how to solve second-order matrix diffrential equation? Linear & Abstract Algebra 6
Problem with easy diffrential equation Calculus & Beyond Homework 2