On the quantum theory of radiation

by A_B
Tags: quantum, radiation, theory
A_B is online now
Nov19-12, 04:48 PM
P: 84

In section 3 of Einstein's "On the quantum theory of radiation" Einstein says equations (8) and (9) follow from (7) and Wien's displacement law. I don't see how that is. For example, if we replace (8) by
\frac{A_m^n}{B_m^n} = \alpha \frac{\nu}{T} \nu^3
All conditions still seem to hold. What am I missing?

Also, can somebody point me to a derivation of Wien's displacement law that does not assume Planck's formula?

Thank you,

Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists consider implications of recent revelations about the universe's first light
Vacuum ultraviolet lamp of the future created in Japan
Grasp of SQUIDs dynamics facilitates eavesdropping
Bill_K is offline
Nov19-12, 05:09 PM
Sci Advisor
Bill_K's Avatar
P: 3,856
He says A and B are constants which are "characteristic for the combination of indices considered". The indices referred to are εm and εn, the initial and final energy of the state, and in particular the energy difference εm - εn, that is, the frequency ν of the emitted radiation. They cannot depend on the temperature T. So the numerator A/B must be a function of ν only, and from Wien's Law it must be proportional to ν3, giving us Eq 8.

Likewise from Wien's Law the denominator must be a function of ν/T, which implies Eq 9.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Is newtons theory of gravity kind of like our current pop theory on quantum mechanics General Physics 7
Is Quantum Field Theory and General Relativity Theory mutually exclusive? Beyond the Standard Model 0
Why quantum field theory is not called quantum mechanics of changeable number particl Quantum Physics 10
Is quantum field theory a genuine quantum theory? Quantum Physics 3
Questions in the quantum theory of radiation Quantum Physics 4