| New Reply |
measurement of an operator |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Nov22-12, 04:26 AM | #1 |
|
|
measurement of an operator
when we have a certain state ψ(t)
and it is acted on by an operator A of eigenstates a, b, c and eigen vectors la>, lb>, lc> does it mean that after measuring A ( if the result was 'a'), the state lψ(t)> becomes in state la>? |
| Nov22-12, 04:28 AM | #2 |
|
|
yes.
|
| Nov22-12, 05:01 AM | #3 |
|
|
i will tell you what was the problem, we were given a state lpsi> the question was: let us carry out a set of two measurements where B is measured first and then, immediately A is measured. Find the probability of obtaining a value of 0 for B and a value of 1 for A.
the first part was easy, i found the eigen pvalues of operator B and eigenstates. and then the probability as they asked. when i moved to the second part, they said exactly, in the solution: we deal now with the measurement of the other observablr A. the observables A and B do not have common eigenstates. After measuring B ( the result is b=0) the system is left in a state lphi> which can be found by projecting lpsi> onto the eigenvector of b=0!!!! How come???? isnot it supposed to be as u claimed in your answer that it be directly in the eigenstate of b=0? |
| Nov22-12, 05:11 AM | #4 |
|
|
measurement of an operator
you have talked about only one operator in op,The second one is different.
|
| Nov22-12, 05:17 AM | #5 |
|
|
then? can you elaborate more? and what is it that is different?
|
| Nov22-12, 05:37 AM | #6 |
|
|
|
| Nov22-12, 05:51 AM | #7 |
|
|
yes, but it is not the case. please read my second post,
|
| Nov23-12, 07:11 AM | #8 |
|
|
|
| Nov23-12, 05:06 PM | #9 |
|
|
Take a look at this: you start with a state [itex]|\Psi\rangle [/itex]. we can write out the operator [itex]\hat{B}[/itex] in terms of it's eigenstates
[tex] \hat{B} = b'_{0} |b_0 \rangle\langle b_0| + b'_{1} |b_1\rangle \langle b_1| + ... [/tex] if we want to pull out an eigenvalue you can just hit this guy with any of the eigenstates we are interested in. Now, Dirac's number one rule: after measuring a system, it is left in an eigenstate of whatever was measured. So we measured the eigenvalue for, say, [itex]b'_0[/itex], so our system is in the state corresponding to that eigenvalue. So take the equation for [itex]\hat{B}[/itex] up above and hit it with [itex]|\Psi\rangle[/itex] on the right. Then [itex]|\langle b_0 |\Psi\rangle|^2[/itex] is the probability to get eigenvalue [itex]b'_0[/itex]. Now the system is in state [itex]|b_0\rangle[/itex], now write the operator [itex]\hat{A}[/itex] like before [tex] \hat{A}=a'_0 |a_0\rangle \langle a_0 |+ ... [/tex] so to compute [itex]\hat{A}|b_0\rangle[/itex] we just hit the above with the state [itex]|b_0\rangle [/itex] on the right. Then the probability for any of the n eigenvalues is [itex]| \langle a_n | b_0 \rangle |^2[/itex]. I hope this helps. |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: measurement of an operator
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| quantum entanglement and measurement operator | Advanced Physics Homework | 0 | ||
| Actual earth measurement contradicts measurement predicted by special relativity | Special & General Relativity | 93 | ||
| Eigenfunctions of translation operator and transposed operator property proof | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 1 | ||
| operator and measurement | Quantum Physics | 17 | ||
| about time measurement vs measurement of movement | Special & General Relativity | 21 | ||