
#1
Nov2612, 12:32 PM

P: 2

Hello everybody, I was watching a documentary about black holes the other day and I noticed something odd.
General Relativity is said to break down when you apply the mathematics on a singularity. In this case, the center of the black hole. The radius of a singularity would be 0. Now there was my problem. I was learned that the smallest possible length, is Planck's length (1.616199 × 1035) meters. I guess that the radius of a singularity would have to be the shortest possible length. What is your opinion on this? And where did I (probably) make my mistake in my 'logic'? Thanks in advance! 



#2
Nov2612, 02:48 PM

Physics
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 5,517

However, it is true that the presence of the singularity at r = 0 in the classical theory is one thing that indicates, to many physicists, that the classical GR theory breaks down at this point; and the best current guess we have right now as to the point at which it breaks down is at a length scale on the order of the Planck length. That doesn't mean that the radius of the singularity is the Planck length instead of zero; it means that, when we have discovered the right theory of quantum gravity, we expect that there will no longer be a singularity at all; instead some new physics will come into play at length scales on the order of the Planck length. We don't have a good theory of quantum gravity yet, so all this is really speculation (educated speculation, but still speculation) until we do. 



#3
Nov2812, 01:31 PM

P: 2

Alright, I get what you mean. I'm going to search some quantum gravity theories, I don't really get the concept of that.
Thanks for answering! 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Time reversal in General Relativity, and black holes  Special & General Relativity  6  
Exploring Black Holes: Introduction to General Relativity  Special & General Relativity  2 