Confusing velocity distribution result

by zn5252
Tags: confusing, distribution, result, velocity
zn5252 is offline
Dec2-12, 05:17 AM
P: 73
Please see attached excerpt of a solution to a problem. I do not understand why the result obtained is to second order ? (this is a diffusion equation they say)
Please let me know if you would need more info.
Attached Thumbnails
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
Internet co-creator Cerf debunks 'myth' that US runs it
Astronomical forensics uncover planetary disks in Hubble archive
Solar-powered two-seat Sunseeker airplane has progress report
HallsofIvy is offline
Dec2-12, 07:46 AM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 38,904
What does "at n- 1" mean?
zn5252 is offline
Dec2-12, 09:13 AM
P: 73
n-1 means at the step which is prior to step n where n is the number of boosts . I have attached the first paragraph for more details.
Attached Thumbnails

haruspex is offline
Dec2-12, 09:32 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
P: 9,215

Confusing velocity distribution result

It's because the first order differences will cancel out: f(x+dx) + f(x-dx) ≈ f(x) + f'(x)dx + f''(x)dx2/2 + f(x) - f'(x)dx + f''(x)dx2/2 = 2f(x) + f''(x)dx2
zn5252 is offline
Dec3-12, 01:18 PM
P: 73
I see. Thanks a lot !

Register to reply

Related Discussions
integration result ln || - confusing and apparent contradictions! Calculus 4
Why am I getting the wrong result for the expected value of an F-distribution? Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 1
Integrability, basic measure theory: seeking help with confusing result Calculus 7
Confusing result about the spectrum of compact operators Calculus 1
Radial distribution function -- weird result Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 1