New Reply

Confusing velocity distribution result

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Dec2-12, 05:17 AM   #1
 

Confusing velocity distribution result


hello,
Please see attached excerpt of a solution to a problem. I do not understand why the result obtained is to second order ? (this is a diffusion equation they say)
Please let me know if you would need more info.
Thanks,
Attached Thumbnails
Screenshot.png  
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Ants and carnivorous plants conspire for mutualistic feeding
>> Forecast for Titan: Wild weather could be ahead
>> Researchers stitch defects into the world's thinnest semiconductor
Dec2-12, 07:46 AM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
What does "at n- 1" mean?
Dec2-12, 09:13 AM   #3
 
n-1 means at the step which is prior to step n where n is the number of boosts . I have attached the first paragraph for more details.
Attached Thumbnails
Screenshot-1.png  
Dec2-12, 09:32 PM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor

Confusing velocity distribution result


It's because the first order differences will cancel out: f(x+dx) + f(x-dx) ≈ f(x) + f'(x)dx + f''(x)dx2/2 + f(x) - f'(x)dx + f''(x)dx2/2 = 2f(x) + f''(x)dx2
Dec3-12, 01:18 PM   #5
 
I see. Thanks a lot !
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Confusing velocity distribution result
Thread Forum Replies
integration result ln || - confusing and apparent contradictions! Calculus 4
Why am I getting the wrong result for the expected value of an F-distribution? Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 1
Integrability, basic measure theory: seeking help with confusing result Calculus 7
Confusing result about the spectrum of compact operators Calculus 1
Radial distribution function -- weird result Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 1