| New Reply |
Confusing velocity distribution result |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Dec2-12, 05:17 AM | #1 |
|
|
Confusing velocity distribution result
hello,
Please see attached excerpt of a solution to a problem. I do not understand why the result obtained is to second order ? (this is a diffusion equation they say) Please let me know if you would need more info. Thanks, |
| Dec2-12, 07:46 AM | #2 |
|
|
What does "at n- 1" mean?
|
| Dec2-12, 09:13 AM | #3 |
|
|
n-1 means at the step which is prior to step n where n is the number of boosts . I have attached the first paragraph for more details.
|
| Dec2-12, 09:32 PM | #4 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Confusing velocity distribution result
It's because the first order differences will cancel out: f(x+dx) + f(x-dx) ≈ f(x) + f'(x)dx + f''(x)dx2/2 + f(x) - f'(x)dx + f''(x)dx2/2 = 2f(x) + f''(x)dx2
|
| Dec3-12, 01:18 PM | #5 |
|
|
I see. Thanks a lot !
|
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Confusing velocity distribution result
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| integration result ln || - confusing and apparent contradictions! | Calculus | 4 | ||
| Why am I getting the wrong result for the expected value of an F-distribution? | Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics | 1 | ||
| Integrability, basic measure theory: seeking help with confusing result | Calculus | 7 | ||
| Confusing result about the spectrum of compact operators | Calculus | 1 | ||
| Radial distribution function -- weird result | Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics | 1 | ||