| New Reply |
Why isn't spin a 5th dimension? |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Dec17-12, 07:45 AM | #1 |
|
|
Why isn't spin a 5th dimension?
Since spin is a separate variable in a wave function, independent from its location in spacetime, why isn't it considered a dimension beyond the 3+1 of spacetime?
|
| PhysOrg.com |
physics news on PhysOrg.com >> Iron-platinum alloys could be new-generation hard drives >> Promising doped zirconia >> Nanocrystals grow from liquid interface |
| Dec22-12, 06:07 PM | #2 |
|
|
The spin vector (if we allow ourselves to use the semi-classical picture, in which spin forms a vector) has a fixed lenght for any particle (that is, the electron spin 1/2 doesn't change), so it's not really a dimension in that (infinite) sense. You could add a number of "spin dimensions" equal to the number of components of the spin vector and restrict it to a sphere with radius S, but this product space would only describe one particle so it's not very useful. This is why one, for spin chains, sometimes form local product spaces (fibre bundles) where, for each site, there is a space for the spin to rotate in. Such geometrical constructions don't necessarily make the physics easier to learn though.
|
| Dec23-12, 01:16 AM | #3 |
|
|
Thank you, Hypersphere. Excellent, complete answer.
|
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Why isn't spin a 5th dimension?
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Can someone simply (but not too simply) explain spin, spin states and spin flips? | Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics | 3 | ||
| In Electron Spin Resonance, Does Spin Up Have More Energy Than Spin Down? | Quantum Physics | 2 | ||
| Time dimension extent of a 4-dimension object | General Physics | 4 | ||
| dimension of the gamma matrices in general dimension | Quantum Physics | 5 | ||