Register to reply 
Parton distribution functions plot axes 
Share this thread: 
#1
Jan213, 03:24 PM

P: 34

I am slightly confused by the labelling of the vertical axis on parton distribution function plots.
Take the one here: http://www.hep.phy.cam.ac.uk/~wjs/partons2008nlo.jpg as an example. The vertical axis is labelled as xf(x, Q^2), where f is the probability density of finding a particular parton with a given longitudinal momentum fraction x. I think it should simply be f(x, Q^2). Why the extra 'x' in front of f? 


#2
Jan213, 04:49 PM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 16,466

f and xf are two different things. f is the fraction of partons carrying a momentum fraction f, and xf is the fraction of the proton's momentum carried by partons that each carry a momentum fraction x.



#3
Jan213, 05:08 PM

P: 34

Is the purpose of plotting the product xf instead of f to compress the functions along the vertical direction? That is to say, f goes up for low x quite a bit, but the product xf increases less as one decreases x.



#4
Jan213, 06:18 PM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 16,466

Parton distribution functions plot axes
It does that, but the purpose is to represent something different than the fraction of partons carrying a momentum fraction x. It's to represent the fraction of the proton's momentum carried by partons that each carry a momentum fraction x.



#5
Jan313, 04:29 AM

P: 34

If I think of the proton as a sack of balls with the sack moving with a large momentum, then all the balls must be moving at the same speed or they wouldn't stay together. In the approximation that the differences in mass are negligible then all the balls will have the same momentum. That is to say, if a ball has momentum fraction x, then there must be 1/x balls in total in the sack each carrying fraction x of the sack's momentum. Being a quantum sack, the number of balls is not fixed and it is the task of the balls' distribution function to determine the number and kind of them (e.g 10 gluon balls, 2 up balls, 1 down ball). Is this the right way to think about it? 


#6
Jan313, 06:05 AM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 16,466

Maybe examples will help:
The integral of xf(x) must be 1. (The fraction of momentum carried by all of its constituents must sum to 1). The integral of f(x) can sum to anything. The integral of u(x)ubar(x) must sum to 2. (2 up quarks) The integral of d(x)dbar(x) must sum to 1. (1 down quark) 


#7
Jan313, 11:18 AM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 4,160

And thus good reason for focusing on the quantity xf_{i}(x), which as ^{50}V said, is "the fraction of the proton's momentum carried by partons that each carry a momentum fraction x." 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Distribution Plot  Calculus & Beyond Homework  0  
3D Distribution Plot on Matlab  Math & Science Software  0  
3D Distribution Plot on Matlab  Programming & Computer Science  0  
MATLAB: Marginal Distribution Plot  Math & Science Software  3  
Bode plot axes  Electrical Engineering  4 