New Reply

Question about Bloch function in Reduced Zone Scheme

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Jan12-13, 01:26 AM   #1
 

Question about Bloch function in Reduced Zone Scheme


The classical textbook, Introduction to solid state physics by Charles Kittle said:
"If we encounter a Bloch function written as [tex]ψ_{k’}(r)=exp(i{k’}r) u_{k’}(r)[/tex], with k’ outside the first zone, we may find a suitable reciprocal lattice vector G such that k=k’+G lies within the first Brillouin zone. Then
[tex]ψ_{k’}(r)=exp(ik’r) u_{k’}(r)=exp(ikr) [exp(-iGr) u_{k’}(r)][/tex]
[tex]=exp(ikr) u_k(r)=ψ_k(r)[/tex]"
I wonder why [tex]exp(-iGr) u_{k’}(r)=u_k(r)[/tex], how to derive this relation?
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
physics news on PhysOrg.com

>> Study provides better understanding of water's freezing behavior at nanoscale
>> Iron-platinum alloys could be new-generation hard drives
>> Promising doped zirconia
Jan12-13, 02:06 PM   #2
 
He probably defines [itex]u_k(r)[/itex] this way. It is just the old u times a complex phase.
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Question about Bloch function in Reduced Zone Scheme
Thread Forum Replies
Bloch function of an infinite, 1-D linear chain of dz2 orbitals. Advanced Physics Homework 0
Help for supercell, Bloch function Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 2
reduced zone scheme Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 2
Bloch function - Solid state physics Advanced Physics Homework 0
How would the human body function at reduced sizes? Biology 16