Question about Bloch function in Reduced Zone Scheme


by ck00
Tags: bloch, function, reduced, scheme, zone
ck00
ck00 is offline
#1
Jan12-13, 01:26 AM
P: 19
The classical textbook, Introduction to solid state physics by Charles Kittle said:
"If we encounter a Bloch function written as [tex]ψ_{k’}(r)=exp(i{k’}r) u_{k’}(r)[/tex], with k’ outside the first zone, we may find a suitable reciprocal lattice vector G such that k=k’+G lies within the first Brillouin zone. Then
[tex]ψ_{k’}(r)=exp(ik’r) u_{k’}(r)=exp(ikr) [exp(-iGr) u_{k’}(r)][/tex]
[tex]=exp(ikr) u_k(r)=ψ_k(r)[/tex]"
I wonder why [tex]exp(-iGr) u_{k’}(r)=u_k(r)[/tex], how to derive this relation?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Modification of structural composite materials to create tailored lenses
Novel technique opens door to better solar cells
Probing metal solidification nondestructively
0xDEADBEEF
0xDEADBEEF is offline
#2
Jan12-13, 02:06 PM
P: 824
He probably defines [itex]u_k(r)[/itex] this way. It is just the old u times a complex phase.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Bloch function of an infinite, 1-D linear chain of dz2 orbitals. Advanced Physics Homework 0
Help for supercell, Bloch function Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 2
reduced zone scheme Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 2
Bloch function - Solid state physics Advanced Physics Homework 0
How would the human body function at reduced sizes? Biology 16