Register to reply

Question about phase constant

by Sciencer
Tags: constant, phase
Share this thread:
Sciencer
#1
Jan22-13, 02:46 PM
P: 3
we have the wave equation as follows with non zero phase constant:


y(x,t) = ym * sin(k( x - PHI/k) - wt)
or

y(x,t) = ym * sin(kx - w(t + PHI / w))

I don't understand where did the PHI /k or PHI / w came from ??

I understand how did we derive the wave equation but I don't understand this part.
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists discuss quantum pigeonhole principle
First in-situ images of void collapse in explosives
The first supercomputer simulations of 'spin?orbit' forces between neutrons and protons in an atomic nucleus
yungman
#2
Jan22-13, 02:53 PM
P: 3,883
Quote Quote by Sciencer View Post
we have the wave equation as follows with non zero phase constant:


y(x,t) = ym * sin(k( x - PHI/k) - wt)
or

y(x,t) = ym * sin(kx - w(t + PHI / w))

I don't understand where did the PHI /k or PHI / w came from ??

I understand how did we derive the wave equation but I don't understand this part.
You just substitute in and both equation are the same.

But the more basic thing is, I never seen any book write it this way, that is very confusing. The three terms are totally independent. [itex]\omega t[/itex] is the time dependent, kx is distance dependent, and [itex] \phi[/itex] is a phase constant. You don't confuse this more by mixing them together as if they are related.

People usually set either t=0 or x=0 as a reference and generate two separate equations that relate t or x with [itex]\phi[/itex]. With this, you can generate two separate graphs of (y vs t) or (y vs x).
Sciencer
#3
Jan22-13, 03:10 PM
P: 3
I see but what is then the reason for putting it in this form? What is the logic behind it ?

yungman
#4
Jan22-13, 04:10 PM
P: 3,883
Question about phase constant

I don't see the logic and I never seen any book that presented it this way. I disagree with the book. In fact, I am at this very moment doing a lot of digging and asking questions regarding to these very kind of phasing issue with respect to direction of propagation, been searching through a lot of books and no body tries to put the equation like this way.......as if it is not confused enough dealing with phase constant with respects to t and x alone.
andrien
#5
Jan23-13, 01:18 AM
P: 1,020
I don't understand where did the PHI /k or PHI / w came from ??
they just come from simple manipulation,there is nothing special about it.Don't break your head on this.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
What is phase constant General Physics 5
Phase constant of SHM Introductory Physics Homework 7
Question about oscillating currents. (the sign of the phase constant) Introductory Physics Homework 0
Phase Constant Introductory Physics Homework 2
Phase constant -Please help me! Introductory Physics Homework 13