| New Reply |
Why operation * not defined in Q |
Share Thread |
| Jan24-13, 10:44 AM | #1 |
|
|
Why operation * not defined in Q
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Show that l/m * k/n = (l+k)/(m2+n2) can not be defined as an operation in Q when l,k € Z and m, n € Z\{0} I do not know what is the issue here? Should I know something about Q that this not fulfilled by the operation *? |
| Jan24-13, 10:47 AM | #2 |
|
|
|
| Jan24-13, 12:04 PM | #3 |
|
|
Ok.. So the same operation can produce two different results??
So that l/m * k/n = (l+k)/(m2+n2) ≠ (-l+k)/((-m)2+n2) = -l/-m * k/n = l/m * k/n |
| Jan24-13, 12:25 PM | #4 |
|
|
Why operation * not defined in Q |
| Jan24-13, 01:07 PM | #5 |
|
|
Thank you very much jbunniii! Helped me a lot. I think we'll meet again.
|
| New Reply |
Similar discussions for: Why operation * not defined in Q
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Show that matrices of defined form have inverse of the same same defined form | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 2 | ||
| Set operation | Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics | 1 | ||
| Bra-Ket operation | Quantum Physics | 13 | ||
| multi-quote button doesn't work | Forum Feedback & Announcements | 2 | ||
| Bitwise Operation | Electrical Engineering | 0 | ||