New Reply

Derivation of Einstein Field Equations

 
Share Thread
Jan24-13, 10:12 PM   #1
 

Derivation of Einstein Field Equations


I'm reading Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity by Sean M. Carrol and in the chapter on gravitation, he derives the Einstein Field Equations. Here is the part I don't get. He starts with the equation [tex]R_{\mu\nu}-\frac{1}{2} Rg_{\mu\nu}=\kappa T_{\mu\nu}[/tex] Wher [itex]R_{\mu\nu}[/itex] is the Ricci tensor, [itex]\kappa[/itex] is some constant, and [itex]T_{\mu\nu}[/itex] is the stress-energy tensor. Then he sates that by contracting both sides it becomes,[tex]R=-\kappa T[/tex] where [itex]R=R_{\mu\nu}g^{\mu\nu}[/itex] and [itex]T=T_{\mu\nu}g^{\mu\nu}[/itex]. I don't see how he came to this answer. When I tried to work it out myself I got [tex]R=2\kappa T[/tex] This obviously isn't the right answer, and I can't see what I'm missing. I'm drawing a blank here.
PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com

>> City-life changes blackbird personalities, study shows
>> Origins of 'The Hoff' crab revealed (w/ Video)
>> Older males make better fathers: Mature male beetles work harder, care less about female infidelity
Jan24-13, 10:20 PM   #2
 
Blog Entries: 47
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
[tex]g_{\mu\nu}g^{\mu\nu}=4[/tex]
Jan24-13, 10:21 PM   #3
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
[itex]g^{\mu \nu }R_{\mu \nu } - \frac{1}{2}Rg^{\mu \nu }g_{\mu \nu } = R - \frac{1}{2}R\delta ^{\mu }_{\mu } = R - 2R = - R = \kappa T [/itex]
EDIT: robphy beat me to it =D
Jan24-13, 10:22 PM   #4

Astro/Cosmo 2012
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus

Derivation of Einstein Field Equations


I made the same mistake as you the first time I did it. Although [itex]g^\mu_\nu[/itex] has diagonal *elements* that all equal 1, that doesn't mean you can replace it with 1 when you contract. It has four diagonal elements, so [itex]g^\mu_\mu=4[/itex].
Jan24-13, 10:36 PM   #5
 
Oh! It all makes sense now! I wish Carroll would've been a little more explicit in that step, it would've saved me a lot of confusion. Oh well. At least I get it now, thanks to all those who replied.
Jan24-13, 10:41 PM   #6
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by tensor33 View Post
Oh! It all makes sense now! I wish Carroll would've been a little more explicit in that step, it would've saved me a lot of confusion. Oh well. At least I get it now, thanks to all those who replied.
In the future however, make sure you check his errata page because the book does have a ton of errata and in the event that he did make a typo, you don't want to rip your hair out when your result is correct but the thing in the book says something else.
Jan24-13, 10:43 PM   #7
 
Quote by WannabeNewton View Post
In the future however, make sure you check his errata page because the book does have a ton of errata and in the event that he did make a typo, you don't want to rip your hair out when your result is correct but the thing in the book says something else.
Thanks I'll make sure to keep that in mind.
New Reply

Similar discussions for: Derivation of Einstein Field Equations
Thread Forum Replies
Einstein's field equations Special & General Relativity 1
Vector field identity derivation using Einstein summation and kronecker delta. Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
Einstein-scalar field action --> Einstein-scalar field equations Special & General Relativity 1
Pi and Einstein field equations General Physics 6
Einstein's field equations Special & General Relativity 9