| New Reply |
When is the kernel of a linear operator closed? |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Jan26-13, 05:10 PM | #1 |
|
|
When is the kernel of a linear operator closed?
If you consider a bounded linear operator between two Hausdorff topological vector spaces, isn't the kernel *always* closed? I mean, if you assume singleton sets are closed, then the set [itex]\{0\}[/itex] in the image is closed, so that means [itex]T^{-1}(\{0\})[/itex] is closed, right (since T is assumed continuous)? I keep finding these weird provisos all over the Internet (see, for instance, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kernel_(linear_algebra)) that require the target space to be finite-dimensional, and I don't see why this is a necessary hypothesis.
|
| PhysOrg.com |
science news on PhysOrg.com >> Hong Kong launches first electric taxis >> Morocco to harness the wind in energy hunt >> Galaxy's Ring of Fire |
| Jan27-13, 11:15 AM | #2 |
|
|
You are right, if [itex]T:V\rightarrow W[/itex] is continuous and if W is Hausdorff, then [itex]T^{-1}({0})[/itex] is always closed.
Why the weird proviso's like finite-dimensional? Well, because the result in the wiki is an iff statement. So the statement in the theorem also says that if [itex]T^{-1}(\{0\})[/itex] is closed, then T is continuous. This is not true in general but only if W is finite dimensional! |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: When is the kernel of a linear operator closed?
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Showing that the range of a linear operator is not necessarily closed | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 2 | ||
| Question about Linear Operator's Image and Kernel | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 5 | ||
| Kernel of the adjoint of a linear operator | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 4 | ||
| Kernel and images of linear operator, examples | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 2 | ||
| LINEAR ALGEBRA - Describe the kernel of a linear transformation GEOMETRICALLY | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 6 | ||