# On Group Actions !

by Maths Lover
Tags: actions
 P: 62 hi , this result is from text , Abstract Algebra by Dummit and foote . page 120 the result says , if G is a finite group of order n , p is the smallest prime dividing the order of G , then , any subgroup H of G whose index is p is normal and the text gave the proof of this result , but a part of this proof is not obivous for me ! this part is ,all prime divisors (p-1)! are less than p . why is this true ?!! can anyone explain plz ?
P: 768
 all prime divisors (p-1)! are less than p
Do you mean that all prime divisors of (p-1)! are less than p? Are you familiar with the fundamental theorem of arithmetic? It follows immediately from what (p-1)! is that no prime larger than p can be a divisor. Write it out in full; is p in there anywhere?
P: 62
 Quote by Number Nine Do you mean that all prime divisors of (p-1)! are less than p? Are you familiar with the fundamental theorem of arithmetic? It follows immediately from what (p-1)! is that no prime larger than p can be a divisor. Write it out in full; is p in there anywhere?
yes , i'm familiar with it !
can you explain how does this follows from the fundamental theorem of arithmetic ?

P: 768

## On Group Actions !

 Quote by Maths Lover yes , i'm familiar with it ! can you explain how does this follows from the fundamental theorem of arithmetic ?
It follows from the definition of the factorial. Write out the expansion of (p-1)!; p does not appear anywhere in the factorization. How could it? You're multiplying together a bunch of numbers less than p. None of them are going to multiply together to form p (it's prime).
P: 62
 Quote by Number Nine It follows from the definition of the factorial. Write out the expansion of (p-1)!; p does not appear anywhere in the factorization. How could it? You're multiplying together a bunch of numbers less than p. None of them are going to multiply together to form p (it's prime).
take this example !
6 can't divide 3,4,5
but 6 can divide 3*4*5= 60

p can't divide any factor but maybe it can do this with some products of them like the example above ! why not ??
P: 768
 Quote by Maths Lover take this example ! 6 can't divide 3,4,5 but 6 can divide 3*4*5= 60 p can't divide any factor but maybe it can do this with some products of them like the example above ! why not ??
6 is not prime.
(p-1)! has a unique prime factorization. Write out the expansion of (p-1)!, as I said; p does not appear, nor is it a factor of any of the numbers that do appear. Again, review the fundamental theorem of arithmetic.
P: 62
 Quote by Number Nine 6 is not prime. (p-1)! has a unique prime factorization. Write out the expansion of (p-1)!, as I said; p does not appear, nor is it a factor of any of the numbers that do appear. Again, review the fundamental theorem of arithmetic.
yes , i can understand it now :) thanx

 Related Discussions Linear & Abstract Algebra 7 Calculus & Beyond Homework 1 Linear & Abstract Algebra 1 Calculus & Beyond Homework 1 Linear & Abstract Algebra 3